HC Deb 12 February 1985 vol 73 cc121-2W
Mr. Freud

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if, pursuant to the reply of 29 January, Official Report, column 82, he will make known in the form of a circular to local authorities his view that local education

UGC grant distribution for 1985–86
including
University or college Recurrent grant Earmarked capital in recurrent allocations Other additions*
General Shared medical
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Aston 14.79 0.155 0.409
Bath 12.99 0.145 0.231
Birmingham 37.43 0.258 0.153 0.570
Bradford 14.51 0.150 0.121
Bristol 28.85 0.230 0.110 0.571
Brunel 12.84 0.108 0.353
Cambridge 43.00 0.395 0.040 0.902
City 11.49 0.086 0.066
Durham 17.36 0.153 0.495
East Anglia 14.71 0.123 0.512
Essex 8.31 0.076 0.239
Exeter 15.31 0.153 0.136
Hull 14.23 0.137 0.154
Keele 8.38 0.078 0.049
Kent 10.37 0.104 0.193
Lancaster 13.49 0.126 0.149
Leeds 42.18 0.332 0.149 0.578
Leicester 17.83 0.141 0.050 0.261
Liverpool 37.29 0.248 0.142 0.319
LGSBS 1.90 0.008 0.033
London University 231.27 1.074 1.074 3.113
(of which Imperial College) (29.78) (0.201) (0.539)
Loughborough 18.16 0.184 0.424
MBS 1.11 0.004
Manchester 46.40 0.329 0.195 0.627
UMIST 16.15 0.134 0.495
Newcastle 31.89 0.231 0.155 0.943
Nottingham 27.37 0.236 0.065 0.651
Oxford 44.28 0.370 0.056 0.820
Reading 18.84 0.186 0.288
Salford 12.77 0.122 0.322
Sheffield 31.66 0.246 0.115 0.282
Southampton 24.68 0.206 0.080 0.592
Surrey 12.78 0.111 0.087
Sussex 13.99 0.128 0.350
Warwick 17.64 0.158 0.867
York 10.99 0.111 0.288
Total England 937.24 7.036 2.384 16.490
Aberystwyth UC 10.09 0.095 0.148
Bangor UC 10.95 0.088 0.089

authorities have a duty to provide full-time education for young people aged 16 to 19 years, who seek it, including those with special education needs.

Sir Keith Joseph

I have affirmed my view on this subject repeatedly and I am not persuaded that there is any need to restate it in a circular. I have, however, said that I intend to offer advice to the education system later in the year about the role of further education colleges in providing for young people with special educational needs. Such advice will clearly rest upon my view of the duty of local education authorities to secure provision for those aged 16 to 19.