§ Mr. Freudasked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will list in the Official Report, for the latest year available, the figures for the income per student at the following polytechnics: (a) Birmingham, (b) Bristol, (c) Leeds, (d) Leicester, (e) Liverpool, (f) Manchester, (g) Newcastle, (h) Nottingham (Trent), (i) Oxford and (j) Sheffield under the headings (i) income from the advanced further education pool, (ii) direct income from the local education authority in which the institution is located, (iii) endowments, (iv) investment income, (v) fees, (vi) research councils and (vii) other research and consultancy funding; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. WaldenThe recurrent income per full-time equivalent student load for the academic year 1983–84 is estimated to be as follows:
institution is located, (iii) endowments, (iv) investment income, (v) fees, (vi) research and (vii) other research and consultancy funding; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. WaldenThe table below gives figures for the latest available year, 1983–84. The differences between columns (v) and (vi) are largely accounted for by income from maintaining authorities, but may also include inter-authority payments and income from other sources.
161W
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) From AFE pool Tuition fees Research and consultancy fees Other non-grant income Total (i)—(iv) Total expenditure per FTE student Nottingham (Trent) 2,224 520 46 50 2,840 3,229 Oxford 2,186 570 — 5 2,761 3,301 Sheffield 2,220 545 48 97 2,910 3,214 Note: These figures are for those components of income that are separately indentified in returns made by local authorities, and their total, alongside the total recurrent expenditure per student of each polytechnic.