§ Mr. Macleanasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is his policy on the mutilation of domestic animals kept as pets; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. MellorIt is the Government's policy to maintain the present strict standards of control over operative procedures which may cause pain or suffering to pet animals. Pet animals are protected by the Protection of Animals Act 1911 which makes it an offence, inter alia, to cause any unnecessary suffering to an animal or to subject it to any operation which is performed without due care and humanity. The Protection of Animals 273W (Anaesthetics) Act 1954 requires the use of anaesthetics in any operation involving interference with the sensitive tissues on the bone structure with certain exemptions where the operation is not likely to cause pain or is necessary in an emergency. Under the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 certain operations may only be performed by a veterinary surgeon. The Government believe these controls to be adequate but recognise the feeling against mutilation amongst many veterinary surgeons and are keeping them under review.
§ Mr. Macleanasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representation he has received on the mutilation of domestic animals kept as pets.
§ Mr. MellorVery few. The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons has recently drawn my attention to a report produced by its working party in 1976 and the proposed Council of Europe instrument on companion animals has aroused the interest of veterinary and some welfare bodies.