HC Deb 28 November 1983 vol 49 cc365-6W
Dr. Cunningham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list by authority the most recent

Authorities 1980–81 1981–82 1982–83 1983–84
£m £m £m £m
Partnership Authorities
Birmingham
Hackney 0.929 1.331 1.101
Islington 1.911 5.246
Lambeth 2.495 2.125 5.541
Liverpool 5.451 7.799 0.809
Manchester 2.154 0.715
Salford 1.084 1.088
Newcastle-upon-Tyne 5.027 4.661
Gateshead 2.545 2.407
Programme Authorities
Blackburn 0.266 0.011
Bolton
Bradford 0.777 5.211 0.598
Brent 0.662 4.733 4.797 7.870
Coventry 0.511
Hammersmith and Fulham 2014; 1.228
Kingston-upon-Hull 0.384 0.566 0.070
Knowsley 1.426 0.513
Leeds
Leicester 0.810 3.098
Middlesbrough 0.314
Nottingham
Oldham
Rochdale 1.798 2.459 1.089
Sandwell 4.038 1.435
Sheffield 6.518 7.874 14.179
Sunderland 2.219 3.300 3.344
Tower Hamlets 1.351 1.180 0.243
North Tyneside 2.485 3.714
South Tyneside 1.006 0.330
Wandsworth 0.300
Wirral 0.386
Wolverhampton 3.361
Designated Districts
Barnsley 0.387 2.068 0.529
Burnley 0.201 0.153 0.018
Doncaster 2.350 1.587
Ealing 1.172
Haringey 0.897 3.309 8.020
Hartlepool 0.130 0.200 0.342
Langbrough 0.578 0.438
Rotherham 0.472 0.030
St. Helens 0.453 1.999 2.241
Sefton 0.340
Walsall 3.286 4.740 1.971
Wigan 2.512 3.744 0.415
Greenwich 0.846 1.193 8.001
Lewisham 0.907 1.694 1.250 0.801
Newham 2.972 3.321 4.817
Southwark 0.894 1.324 10.905

details of reductions in rate support grant to all partnership and programme authorities and designated districts between 1978–79 and 1983–84.

Mr. Patrick Jenkin

The information requested is in the following table. There were no schemes for grant reductions in 1978–79 and 1979–80. The figures for 1980–81 relate to the transitional arrangements in force prior to the introduction of block grant. The figures for 1981–82 onwards relate to grant held back because authorities exceeded their expenditure targets. The figures for 1981–82 are based on outturn expenditure; those for 1982–83 and 1983–84 are based on budgets.