HC Deb 17 February 1983 vol 37 cc259-61W
Mr. Andrew F. Bennett

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps he has taken to ensure that the inspectors who will be making decisions on public path orders and definitive map orders after 28 February are adequately trained to deal with the legal issues involved in the making of such decisions.

Mr. Macfarlane

The inspectors selected to undertake this will receive suitable training. They will also have access as required to specialist advice and guidance on points of law and procedure arising in connection with cases allocated to them for determination.

Mr. Andrew F. Bennett

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list those definitive maps of public rights of way of which no review has been begun by the surveying authority, and to which sections 53 and 54 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 will apply from 28 February.

Mr. Macfarlane

The county councils and London borough councils listed as follows do not have an outstanding published draft review of their definitive maps and statements. This does not necessarily mean that all the authorities concerned are in a position to exercise the powers at section 53 and 54 of the Act since they may have begun a review but not yet published a draft revised map and statement.

County Councils

  • Avon
  • Bedfordshire
  • Cambridgeshire (former Isle of Ely and Huntingdon and Peterborough)
  • Cheshire
  • Gloucestershire
  • 260
  • Hampshire
  • Hereford and Worcester (former Worcestershire)
  • Hertfordshire
  • Humberside (former Lincolnshire and West Riding of Yorkshire)
  • Isle of Wight
  • Lancashire
  • Lincolnshire
  • North Yorkshire (former North Riding of Yorkshire)
  • Northumberland
  • Salop
  • Suffolk
  • Surrey
  • West Sussex (former West Sussex)
  • Greater Manchester
  • Merseyside
  • South Yorkshire
  • Tyne and Wear
  • West Midlands

London Borough Councils

  • Barking
  • Barnet
  • Brent
  • Bromley
  • Croydon
  • Ealing
  • Enfield
  • Haringey
  • Havering
  • Hillingdon
  • Hounslow
  • Kingston upon Thames
  • Merton
  • Newham
  • Sutton
  • Waltham Forest

Mr. Andrew F. Bennett

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list those definitive maps of public rights of way of which a review has been begun but not completed by the surveying authority, and to which sections 53 and 54 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 will not apply until the review has been completed or abandoned.

Mr. Macfarlane

The county councils and London borough councils listed as follows have published a draft review of their definitive maps and statements and thus will not be able to apply the provisions of sections 53 and 54 of the Act until that review is completed or abandoned.

County Councils

  • Berkshire
  • Buckinghamshire
  • Cambridgeshire (former Cambridgeshire)
  • Cleveland
  • Cornwall
  • Cumbria
  • Derbyshire
  • Devon
  • Dorset
  • Durham
  • East Sussex
  • Essex
  • Hereford and Worcester (former Herefordshire)
  • Humberside (former East Riding of Yorkshire)
  • Kent
  • Leicestershire
  • Norfolk
  • North Yorkshire (former East Riding of Yorkshire)
  • Northamptonshire
  • Nottinghamshire
  • Oxfordshire
  • Somerset
  • Staffordshire
  • Warwickshire
  • Wests Sussex (former East Sussex)
  • Wiltshire
  • West Yorkshire

London Borough Councils

  • Bexley
  • Harrow
  • Redbridge
  • Richmond-upon-Thames

Mr. Andrew F. Bennett

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will list those areas for which a survey has been begun but for which no definitive map of public rights of way has been published, and to which sections 53 and 54 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 will not apply until the survey has been completed or abandoned;

(2) if he will list those areas for which no survey has been begun and for which a definitive map of public rights of way will, after 28 February, be produced under section 55(3) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

£
1. Coopers, Lybrand Report on the Economic Potential of London Docklands 94,300
Supporting Working Papers and Business Plan 14,950
Discussion paper on UDC financial regime 24,500
Accounts Study 17,550
2. Rendall, Palmer & Tritton Engineering study of the fabric of the docks and development options 74,750
3. Control Data Corporation/City Exploratory study of the potential application in Docklands of City Venture's US 5,000
Venture Corporation experience in job creation and economic revitalisation
4. Healey & Baker Advice on the valuation of land and buildings in the Isle of Dogs, in relation to the proposed Enterprise Zone 11,500
5. Donaldson & Sons Survey of local ownership and use and development potential in the area north of Jamaica Road 6,612.50
6. City Squash Investigation of the possibility of providing an indoor Sports Centre at Millwall Dock 3,450
7. Darbourne & Darke Study of the planning and housing development constraints and opportunities of sites in Elephant Lane, Brunei Road and Albion Street 31,625
8. Robert Mather, Johnson-Marshall Study to determine the scope for environmental improvement on the main approaches to Docklands related to the Royal Mint site 24,437.50
9. Professor David Gosling Isle of Dogs urban design study 3,000
311,675