§ Mr. Carter-Jonesasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what ordinary or emergency provision is made at magistrates' courts for communication service for persons who are unable to communicate when charged; how many physically or mentally handicapped persons have been held in custody because of communication problems; whether steps are being taken to improve these services; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. MayhewIt is for the magistrates' courts to ensure that they can communicate adequately with persons appearing in proceedings before them, and that any necessary interpreters are obtained. No central records are kept of such cases and I am not aware of any general difficulties in this respect.
In the recent case about which I believe the hon. Member is concerned, there was difficulty in obtaining a deaf and dumb interpreter over a bank holiday weekend. However, the court was satisfied that it could communicate with the defendant and that he understood and could follow the proceedings. While the case was adjourned over the weekend the defendant was remanded in custody under the provisions of the Bail Act 1976. Upon conviction he was remanded in custody for a week because the court, having regard to his antecedents, required reports to be prepared to assist in determining the appropriate sentence.