HC Deb 02 December 1981 vol 14 cc158-60W
Mr. Stallard

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will update the information contained in the tables in the consultative document "Assistance with Housing Costs" in view of recent changes in benefits.

Mr. Rossi

I gave this information in reply to my hon. Friend, the Member for Hornchurch (Mr. Squire) on 25 November—[Vol. 13, c.416–418.]—but one table appeared out of order. The information in the correct order is below.

Revised estimates of the information provided in annexes A, C and D of the consultative document "Assistance with Housing Costs"—DOE: March 1981—have now been made. These have been prepared on a mid-1981 basis, and are as follows:

Annex A
The numbers of Households affected by the proposals
Table 1 The present situation
Type of benefit Estimated No. of households in mid-1981 million Average benefit pw in 1981–82 £ Estimated cost in 1981–82 million
Supplementary benefit (Housing addition) 2.7 11.90 c1,800
Rent rebate (Local authority tenants) 1.6 6.89 570

Type of benefit Estimated No. of households in mid-1981 million Average benefit pw in 1981–82 £ Estimated cost in 1981–82 million
Rent allowance (Private tenants) 0.2 4.74 60
Rate rebate (all tenures) 3.5 1.86 338

Note: numbers of households are not cumulative as most recipients of rent rebates also claim rate rebates.

Table 2 the effects of the proposed change on existing recipients (Numbers are estimates based on the situation in mid-1981)
A. Rebate recipients million
Local authority tenants (Rent and rates) *1.7
Private tenants (Rent and rates) *0.3
Owner occupiers (Rates only) *1.5
* Claiming and payment systems unchanged. Entitlements affected by changes in tapers.

B. Estimated position in respect of SB recipients with income below Scale Rate plus
Additional Requirements plus Non-Rebatable Housing Costs
i. Without non-dependants—entitled to 100 per cent assistance with housing costs
million
Local authority tenants (Rent and rates) *1.20
Owner occupiers (Rates only) *0.40
Private tenants (Rent and rates) *0.39
* DHSS certifies 100 per cent. housing benefit entitlement to local authorities. Authorities issue demands rebated for the period certified, or cash, as appropriate.

ii. With non-dependants—entitlement to 100 per cent. assistance less non-dependant deductions
million
Local authority tenants (rent and rates) 0.25*
Owner occupiers (rates only) 0.07*
Private tenants (rent and rates) 0.04*
* As above except that local authorities issue rent/rate demands to cover non-dependant deductions or reduce cash benefit, as appropriate.

C. Owner occupiers million
Mortgage interest only—for rates see B above 0.14*
* Means testing, eligibility assessment and payment continues to be by DHSS.

For all the above households the DHSS checking of rent/rates is eliminated as is DHSS payment of individual cash amounts. Local authority collection of rent and/or rates from the households without non-dependants is also eliminated.

D. SB recipients with income equal to or greater than Scale Rate plus Additional Requirements plus Non-Rebatable Housing Costs

Claimants who switch to HB calculated according to income—

Those no worse off as a result of the change Those entitled to DHSS topping up payments
Local authority tenants 36,000 106,000
Private tenants 30,000 25,000
Owner occupiers 6,000 8,000

ANNEX C
Distributional Effects of Proposed Reform on Recipients of Rebate Estimated numbers of households at mid-1981 ('000s) (GB)
LA tenants Private tenants Owner Occupiers Total
Losers
Weekly amounts (£)
0.01–0.25 220 90 620 920
0.26–0.50 240 50 270 550
0.51–0.75‡ 580 50 60 690
Total 1040 190 940 2170
Gainers
Weekly amounts (£)
0.01–0.50 100 30 200 320
0.51–1.00 90 40 110 230
1.01–1.50 70 20 90
1.51–2.00 60 20 * 80
2.00‡ 130 10 * 140
Total 450 110 310 870
Breakers-even
Total 240 50 240 530

Notes

* indicates no households

† indicates that the sample is too small to allow a reasonable estimate sub-totals may not add to totals because of rounding

‡ theoretical losses if the Government's decision to limit rebate losses generally to 75p had not been made:

0.51–0.75 180 20 50 240
0.76–1.00 150 10 10 170
1.01–1.50 190 10 210
l.51† 70 70

ANNEX D
Distributional Effects of the Proposed Reform of Supplementary Benefit Recipients
Estimated number of recipients in mid 1981 (000's) (GB)
Weekly gain or topping up payment (£) Topping up cases Gainers
0.01–0.99 37 37
1.00–1.99 46 17
2.00–2.99 35 8
3.00 and over 22 11
Total 139 73

Forward to