HC Deb 21 July 1980 vol 989 cc50-5W
Mr. Kilroy-Silk

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will detail the steps that are taken when a criminal offence is alleged to have been committed by a person enjoying diplomatic immunity, especially in relation to his removal from the United Kingdom and reparation to the victim.

Mr. Brittan

When the police are satisfied that a person alleged to have committed a criminal offence is entitled to claim diplomatic immunity, they report the facts of the case to the Department. The Home Office then recommends to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office such further action as is considered appropriate. It is the practice for details of every alleged offence to be brought to the attention of the appropriate head of mission.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if any person enjoying diplomatic immunity has been alleged to have committed more than one criminal offence; if so, what they were; when they occurred; and if the person concerned is still in the United Kingdom.

Mr. Brittan

Since 1 January 1977, 51 persons entitled to claim diplomatic immunity have been alleged to have committed more than one offence; 24 of these persons are believed still to be resident in the United Kingdom. I regret that the other information requested is not readily available.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons enjoying diplomatic immunity were alleged to have committed the 34 offences against the Theft Act 1968, including shoplifting, in 1979; and how many of them are still in the United Kingdom.

Mr. Brittan

Thirty. According to records held by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 15 of these persons were still in the United Kingdom on 16 July 1980.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will indicate the nature of the four cases of violence upon the person and the three cases of sexual assault, the two drug offences and the seven other offences alleged to have been committed by persons entitled to diplomatic immunity in 1979.

Mr. Brittan

The legal descriptions of the alleged offences to which the question refers are as follows:

Violence against the person:
Assault contrary to section 42 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 3
Assaulting a police officer contrary to section 51 (1) of the Police Act 1964 1
Sexual offences:
Attempted gross indecency contrary to section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 1
Indecent assault contrary to section 14 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 1
Incest contrary to section 10 (1) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956
Drug offences:
Possession of a controlled drug contrary to section 5 (2) of the Abuse of Drugs Act 1971 2
Other offences:
Loitering with intent to commit an arrestable offence contrary to section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824, as amended 2
Obstructing a police officer contrary to section 51 (3) of the Police Act 1964 2
Possessing an offensive weapon contrary to section 1 of the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 1
Using abusive words and behaviour contrary to section 54 (13) of the Metropolitan Police Act 1839 1
Avoiding payment of fare contrary to section 5 (3) (a) of the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 1

Mr. Kilroy-Silk

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what and how many offences were alleged to have been committed so far in the current year by persons entitled to diplomatic immunity; and if any were proceeded with;

(2) if any persons enjoying diplomatic immunity who were alleged to have committed criminal offences in the current year are still in the United Kingdom; and, if so, what was the alleged offence; and why they are still here.

Mr. Brittan

The number of offences alleged to have been committed is shown in the following table. Seventeen of the 120 persons entitled to claim diplomatic immunity who were suspected of involvement in these offences have since left the United Kingdom. There have been no criminal proceedings in connection with any of these alleged offences.

Offences alleged to have been committed by persons entitled to diplomatic immunity: 1 January 1980 to 16 July 1980
Violence against the person 1
Offences against the Theft Act 1968 (including shoplifting) 13
Drugs offences 1
Drink offences (e.g. drunk and disorderly) 3
Road traffic offences involving drink 16
Other road traffic offences* 82
Other offences 4
120
* Excluding those dealt with by fixed penalty notices.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if any diplomatic mission pays for the fixed penalty notices incurred by members of the mission enjoying diplomatic immunity.

Mr. Brittan

The available records do not indicate whether any diplomatic mission as such has paid a fixed penalty. But it is believed that certain diplomatic missions in London expect members of their staff to pay parking fines even though they are entitled to diplomatic immunity.

Mr. Kilroy-Silk

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many fixed penalty notices were cancelled for each diplomatic mission in 1979 and so far in the current year.

Mr. Brittan

The following table, compiled from provisional figures made available by the Metropolitan Police, gives particulars of the total number of fixed penalty notices issued in the Metropolitan Police distriot cancelled on grounds of diplomatic immunity during 1979 and for the first five months of 1980.

"Fixed penalty" notices cancelled on grounds of diplomatic immunity
1979 January to May 1980
Afghanistan 50 2
Algeria 164 123
Argentine 653 305
Australia 12 22
Austria 140 47
Bahamas 7 4
Bahrain 175 73
Bangladesh 188 70
Barbados 148 64
Belgium 192 88
Bolivia 73 17
Botswana 28 7
Brazil 596 258
Bulgaria 1,312 624
Burma 67 20
Cameroon 415 185
Canada 60 28
Chile 42 20
China 166 54
Colombia 348 140
Costa Rica 61 51
Cuba 1,131 570
Cyprus 1,472 535
Czechoslovakia 133 66
Denmark 43 15
Dominican Rep. 136 51
Commonwealth of Dominica 3 4
Ecuador 199 58
Egypt 2,773 695
El Salvador 20 9
Ethiopa 130 88
Fiji 5
Finland 502 243
France 2,062 823
Gabon 125 90
Gambia 158 43
German Democratic Rep. 231 60
Germany, Fed. Rep. of 148 69
Ghana 1,240 354
Greece 588 300
Grenada 11 3
Guyana 169 71
Haiti 12 3
Honduras 105 49
Hungary 668 237
Iceland 9 2
India 489 472
Indonesia 586 229
Iran 682 225
Iraq 1,166 565
Ireland, Rep. of 116 45
Israel 436 165
Italy 406 248
Ivory Coast 431 101
Jamaica 1,396 480
Japan 437 125
Jordan 1,576 465
Kenya 679 423
Korea 805 288
Kuwait 933 318
Laos 9 2
Lebanon 75 17
Lesotho 30 14

1979 January to May 1980
Liberia 95 32
Libya 1,586 673
Luxembourg 19 1
Malawi 37 7
Malaysia 1,184 473
Malta 255 76
Mauritius 123 43
Mexico 228 105
Mongolia 7 3
Morocco 345 170
Nepal 40 14
Netherlands 33 14
New Zealand 2
Nicaragua
Nigeria, Fed. Rep. of Rep. of 5,319 1,910
Norway 54 16
Oman 98
Pakistan 1,243 247
Panama 263 140
Papua New Guinea 18 6
Paraguay 140 103
Peru 556 216
Philippines 204 110
Poland 345 193
Portugal 581 224
Qatar 598 215
Romania 633 221
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia 1,930 655
Senegal 159 61
Seychelles 88 19
Sierra Leone 247 99
Singapore 48 31
Somali Dem. Rep. 66 17
South Africa 12 5
Soviet Union 746 337
Spain 801 473
Sri Lanka 201 71
Sudan 561 154
Swaziland 82 13
Sweden 94 31
Switzerland 14 18
Syrian Arab Rep. 292 110
Tanzania 254 137
Thailand 954 299
Togo 101 30
Tonga 2
Trinidad and Tobago 164 50
Tunisia 176 97
Turkey 598 267
Uganda 20 72
United Arab Emirates 594 216
United States of America 130 72
Uruguay 42 25
Venezuala 450 160
Vietnam 4 1
Yemen Arab Rep. 97 129
Yemen, Peoples Dem. Rep 136 49
Yugoslavia 659 401
Zaire 422 114
Zambia 495 210
Commonwealth Secretariat 59 38
Eastern Caribbean Commission 2 1
EEC Commission 7 2
International Cocoa Organisation 7 1

1979 Jaunary to May 1980
International Coffee Organisation 2 1
Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organisation 27 1
Western European Union 10 1
United Nations 1
North Atlantic Treaty Organisation 1
Total 52,453 20,603

Forward to