HC Deb 06 June 1978 vol 951 cc29-30W
Mr. John Moore

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will publish a table showing (a) the number of employed in employment, (b) the employed labour force and (c) the numbers wholly unemployed, in the form of annual indices from 1945 to the present day, 1945=100.

Mr. Golding

Because there has been a number of changes in the methods of making employment estimates, a consistent series of figures from 1945 to the present day does not exist. The table below shows indices for the periods during which the figures are comparable with the beginning of each period taken as the base year. Details of the methods used to produce the estimates on which the figures below are based are given in British Labour Statistics—Historical Abstract 1886–1968 (Appendix B and footnotes to pp 218–220) and Department of Employment Gazette for March 1975 (pp 193–196, December 1976 (pp 1344–1346) and June 1977 (pp 604–605).

Great Britain (mid-year figures)
Employees in employment Employed labour force‡ Registered unemployed§
1945 * 100 100
1946 * 90 365
1947 * 93 252
1948(1) * 93 264
1948(2) * 100 100
1949 * 100 93
1950(1) * 101 99
1950(2) 100 100 99
1951 101 102 66
1952 101 102 107
1953 101 102 100
1954 103 103 82
1955 105 105 66
1956 106 106 69
1957 106 106 89
1958 106 105 133
1959(1) 106 105 139
1959 (2) 100 100 139
1960 102 102 108
1961 104 103 92
1962 105 104 135
1963 105 104 167
1964 107 105 115
1965 108 106 98
1966 109 107 92
1967 107 105 169
1968 106 105 183
1969 106 105 175
1970 105 104 190
1971 103 103 249
1972 103 103 277
1973 106 105 197
1974 106 105 187
1975 106 105 300
1976 105 104 463
1977 106† 105† 504
* Separate estimates of employees in employment for these years are not available.
† Employment indices for 1977 are provisional.
‡ The employed labour force comprises employees in employment, the self-employed (with or without employees) and Her Majesty's Forces.
§ From 1967 onwards, full-time adult students registering for temporary employment have been excluded. Their inclusion before then is thought to have had a negligible effect on the index.

Back to