§ Mr. Paul Deanasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the loss of revenue if the investment income surcharge was abolished.
§ Mr. Robert SheldonI shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
§ Mr. Paul Deanasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the loss of revenue if the threshold for the investment income surcharge for those aged 65 years was raised to £4,500, with an equivalent increase in the threshold for those under 65 years of age.
§ Mr. Robert SheldonI shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
§ Mr. Paul Deanasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the loss of revenue if the higher threshold for 348W investment income surcharge operated from age 60 instead of age 65 years.
§ Mr. Robert SheldonI shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.