§ Mr. Kilroy-Silkasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many 14–year-old girls have been remanded to prisons or remand centres since 31st
Capital £ Recurrent non-capital £ Non-recurrent non-capital £ 1973— Sheffield … … … … … 76,110 10,643 1,100 Leeds … … … … … 71,747 2,753 800 Manchester … … … … 27,600 8,594 3,622 Liverpool … … … … … 165,470 28,415 26,820 Newcastle … … … … … 33,125 12,230 1,334 1974*— Sheffield … … … … … Nil Nil 2,023 Leeds … … … … … Nil Nil 1,608 Manchester … … … … Nil Nil 4,096 Liverpool … … … … … Nil Nil 6,000 Newcastle … … … … … Nil Nil 2,534 1975— Sheffield … … … … … 91,340 3,550 1,886 Leeds … … … … … 140,747 18,015 1,190 Manchester … … … … 123,637 31,060 6,330 Liverpool … … … … … 226,543 66,554 8,000 Newcastle … … … … … 30,000 25,399 3,652 1976— Sheffield … … … … … Nil 2,445 1,875 Leeds … … … … … 101,275 Nil 4,748 Manchester … … … … 42,600 48,590 4,437 Liverpool … … … … … 159,200 Nil 10,000 Newcastle … … … … … 23,500 23,336 5,714 * Approvals were given in 1974 only in respect of non-recurrent holiday projects.
§ Mr. Hooleyasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list in the Offical Report the projects approved for Sheffield under the urban programme in 1976–77 and 1977–78.
§ Mr. JohnThe projects approved for Sheffield to start in 1976–77 are as follows:
36W
CIRCULAR 14 Non-capital project Approved cost £ per annum Family Service Unit: work with children at risk 2,445 December 1976; and how many are so remanded at the present time.
§ Mr. JohnAccording to our records during the period from 1st to 9th January 1977, no 14–year-old girls have been received on remand in Prison Department establishments, and there were no such girls on remand on 9th January