§ Mr. Steenasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) when the hon. Member for Liverpool, Wavertree may expect an answer to his letters of 14th July asking for an explanation why the inhabitants of Nos. 32 to 42 Ashfield House, Liverpool have had to wait 18 months to have their appeals heard as to why their flats in an aged persons' home arc being rated as commercial rather than domestic lettings;
(2) when the hon. Member for Liverpool, Wavertree may expect an answer to his letters of 14th July asking for an explanation why the inhabitants of Nos. 19 to 31 Ashfield House, Liverpool have had to wait 18 months to have their appeals heard as to why their fiats in an aged persons' home are being rated as commercial rather than domestic lettings;
(3) when the hon. Member for Liverpool, Wavertree, may expect an answer to his letters of 14th July asking for an explanation why the inhabitants of Nos. 10 to 18 Ashfield House, Liverpool have had to wait 18 months to have their appeals heard as to why their flats in an aged persons' home are being rated as commercial rather than domestic lettings;
(4) when the hon. Member for Liverpool, Wavertree, may expect an answer to his letters of 14th July asking for an explanation why the inhabitants of Nos. 680W 2 to 9 Ashfield House, Liverpool have had to wait 18 months to have their appeals heard as to why their fiats in an aged persons' home are being rated as commercial rather than domestic lettings.
§ Mr. Robert SheldonI have now written to the hon. Member.