§ Mr. Urwinasked the Secretary of State for Defence what representations he has received from trade unions and other organisations about job losses arising from 467W the review of defence expenditure; what discussions he has undertaken: and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. William RodgersRepresentations from trade unions, especially in the aircraft and guided weapons, industries, have continued since my right hon. Friend's statement of 3rd December 1974. I met a further deputation representing Hawker Siddeley Dynamics as recently as Friday last. As for civilians employed by the Ministry of Defence, consultations have already begun in order to achieve the savings set out in the Defence White Paper. Ministers continue to make clear on all suitable occasions that cuts in defence spending must inevitably be reflected in a loss of job opportunities.
§ Mr. Urwinasked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement about the future of the defence equipment industries.
§ Mr. William RodgersThe defence industries have a long record in the development and production of high quality equipment. Our Services will have a continuing need for their support within the limits set by the level of defence expenditure. The industries will also have their part to play in our endeavours to increase standardisation and to extend the scope of collaboration and joint procurement which is essential if the NATO Alliance is to obtain the maximum military benefit from defence resources. In addition their export contribution will remain very important.