HC Deb 22 July 1975 vol 896 cc168-9W
Mr. Cordle

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will introduce appropriate legislation to obviate the need for a landlord to obtain a court order before being entitled to repossess premises at the expiration of a lease of the type specified in Case 10B of Part II of Schedule 3 to the Rent Acts 1968 and 1974.

Mr. Armstrong

No. No tenant of a dwelling should be liable to eviction without a court order.

Mr. Cordle

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will introduce appropriate amending legislalation to enable a landlord entitled to claim possession of premises pursuant to Case 10B of Part II of Schedule 3 to the Rent Acts 1968 and 1974 to treat a tenant who refuses to vacate the premises as a trespasser, against whom possession might he obtained pursuant to Order 113 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Order 26 of the County Court Rules.

Mr. Armstrong

No. A tenant who took up possession lawfully cannot be equated with and should not be treated as a squatter.

Mr. Cordle

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will introduce appropriate amending legislation to enable a landlord who would he entitled to claim possession of premises pursuant to Case 10B of Part II of Schedule 3 to the Rent Acts 1968 and 1974 at the expiration of the actual tenancy to apply to the county court for a possession order which shall take effect upon the expiration of that tenancy.

Mr. Armstrong

No. There can be no ground for action while the tenant is in occupation under the terms of a contractual agreement.

Forward to