HC Deb 19 June 1969 vol 785 cc138-41W
65. Mr. Frank Allaun

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government why the rents fixed by the rent assessment committees in London, Birmingham and Southampton are higher than those for similar dwellings in the rest of the country; and if he will now introduce amending legislation to ensure that rent assessment committees exclude the housing shortage factor from their consideration.

Mr. MacColl

Section 46(2) of the Rent Act, 1968, following Section 27(2) of the Rent Act, 1965, requires rent officers and rent assessment committees to assume in fixing fair rents that the local demand for dwellings of the type under consideration does not substantially exceed the supply; hence, the re- quirement my hon. Friend is seeking is already embodied in legislation.

No figures are available to illustrate average rents of similar dwellings in different registration areas; the figures I am supplying in answer to another Question by my hon. Friend give the average rents registered for all dwelling considered by rent assessment committees.

Mr. Frank Allaun

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government (1) if he will state the average increase in rents fixed by the rent assessment committees in London, Birmingham, Southampton and each of the London boroughs, respectively, and that for the rest of the country and for the whole country to the latest convenient date, compared with the previous controlled rents of these dwellings;

(2) how many rents have been fixed above and below, respectively, the previous controlled rent by rent assessment committees in London, Birmingham, Southampton and each of the London boroughs, respectively, and in the rest of the country and in the whole country to the latest convenient date.

Mr. MacColl

I regret that this information is not available, since the statistical material on tenancies for which rents have been registered under the rent regulation machinery does not indicate whether a tenancy was previously controlled.

Mr. Frank Allaun

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he will state the average rent determined by rent assessment committees in London, Birmingham, Southampton and each of the London boroughs, respectively, and that for the rest of the country and for the whole country to the latest convenient date.

Mr. MacColl

This information is available from the commencement of the rent regulation scheme in 1966 up to the end of 1968 for cases where the basis on which the rent assessment committee determined the rent was comparable with the basis on which the previous rent rested.

The details are as follows:

Area Number of Cases Analysed and on which average rent is based Average rent determined by Rent Assessment Committees 1966 to end 1968
£ p.a.
Greater London 4,331 233
Birmingham C.B. 131 169
Southampton C.B. 33 194
London Boroughs:
Westminster 430 359
Camden 245 263
Islington 162 170
Hackney 690 189
Tower Hamlets 216 101
Greenwich 67 157
Lewisham 233 190
Southwark 234 158
Lambeth 140 255
Wandsworth 119 261
Hammersmith 100 234
Kensington and Chelsea 117 396
Waltham Forest 99 194
Redbridge 46 250
Havering 10 223
Barking 23 191
Newham 232 150
Bexley 35 222
Bromley 28 240
Croydon 43 250
Sutton 25 253
Merton 48 214
Kingston upon Thames 70 261
Richmond upon Thames 40 295
Hounslow 70 248
Hillingdon 18 240
Ealing 230 289
Brent 85 233
Harrow 17 280
Barnet 188 327
Haringey 224 240
Enfield 47 205
City of London
England and Wales excluding Greater London, Birmingham C.B. and Southampton C.B. 2,019 163
England and Wales 6,514 210

Mr. Frank Allaun

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he will state the average rent determined by rent assessment committees in London, Birmingham, Southampton and each of the London boroughs, respectively, for a two-bedroomed terraced house with a bathroom, and without a bathroom, respectively, and that for these two types in the rest of the country and for the whole country to the latest convenient date.

Mr. MacColl

This information is not available, and could not be obtained without undue cost and disruption of other work.

Back to