HC Deb 08 December 1967 vol 755 cc408-9W
Mr. Roebuck

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will make a statement about the progress made towards the introduction of comprehensive education in the London Borough of Harrow.

Miss Bacon

The Harrow Authority submitted proposals in response to Circular 10/65 on 26th October, 1966. These proposals were rejected by my right hon. Friend's predecessor on 26th January, 1967 because the form of organisation envisaged involved a continuation of the selective system. The Authority were asked to reconsider the possibilities and to submit revised proposals in accordance with the intentions of Circular 10/65. Representatives of the Authority met officers of the Department on 7th March to discuss possible lines on which more acceptable proposals might be formulated. Since then I understand that the Authority have been considering possible solutions, but they have made no further formal submission to the Department.

Mr. Roebuck

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many local authority schemes for comprehensive education have been implemented wholly or in part, or been approved by his department; how many are being considered by his Department; and how many local authorities schemes are still awaited.

Miss Bacon

101 local education authorities now have schemes covering the whole or part of their areas either implemented or approved; proposals from a further 21 authorities are now being considered by my Department; and we are still awaiting proposals from 24 authorities. There are four authorities which have declined to submit a scheme and 12 which my right hon. Friend has asked to reconsider the proposals which they submitted to him.