HC Deb 27 July 1964 vol 699 cc201-2W
Mr. Mackenzie

asked the Minister of Labour if he will state the yearly average number of persons employed in Rutherglen and Cambuslang from 1951 to the latest available date.

AVERAGE NUMBERS REGISTERED AS UNEMPLOYED
Rutherglen Cambuslang
Year Average Number Group Per cent. rate* Average Number Group Per cent. rate†
1951 320 2.7 372 4.8
1952 398 565
1953 378 526
1954 320 496
1955 288 449
1956 235 391
1957 222 366
1958 369 747
1959 505 835
1960 598 3.9 573 5.2
1961 535 3.3 409 4.5
1962 641 4.0 480 6.4
1963. 870 5.7 632 7.8
Jan.-June, 1964 716 4.8 422 5.3
* The percentage rate refers to the Glasgow travel-to-work area which comprises the Employment Exchange areas of Glasgow (Central), Glasgow (South Side), Barrhead, Bridgeton, Clydebank, Govan, Hillington, Kinning Park, Kirkintilloch, Maryhill, Parkhead, Partick, Rutherglen and Springburn.
† The percentage rate refers to the North Lanarkshire travel-to-work area which comprises the Employment Exchange areas of Motherwell, Airdrie, Bellshill, Blantyre, Cambuslang, Carluke, Coatbridge, East Kilbride, Hamilton, Larkhall, Uddingston and Wishaw.
Note.—Separate percentage rates of unemployment are not quoted for constituent parts of travel-to-work areas as they would be misleading.

Mr. Godber

Following is the information:

ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF EMPLOYEES IN EMPLOYMENT (Thousands)
Mid-Year Rutherglen Cambuslang
1951 12.0 6.1
1952 11.8 8.0
1953 12.9 7.9
1954 12.0 8.3
1955 12.3 8.6
1956 12.9 7.8
1957 15.7 7.9
1958 13.1 6.8
1959 12.1 6.6
1960 12.1 8.0
1961 13.4 7.0
1962 12.7 6.9
1963 12.6 7.1

Mr. Mackenzie

asked the Minister of Labour if he will state the yearly average number of persons in Rutherglen and Cambuslang registered as unemployed in 1951 and in subsequent years to the latest convenient date; and what percentage these figures represent of the insured population in these areas.

Mr. Godber

I regret that the full information requested is not readily available and the very considerable amount of time involved in its preparation for all the years requested would not be justified.

Following is the information: