§ Mr. Dempseyasked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish the names of the private housing associations receiving subsidies, the total subsidy received to date in each case, the number of houses built and under construction in each case and the areas in which they are sited.
§ Mr. Maclay,pursuant to his reply [OFFICIAL REPORT, 12th February, 1962; Vol. 653, c. 113–114] supplied the following information
55W
Number of houses Association Total Exchequer subsidy paid to date (at November, 1961) Completed Under Construction Areas in which houses built Notes £ s. Dunedin Self-Build Association 16,118 0 55 — Edinburgh — Edinburgh Welfare Housing Trust 1,984 10 12. — Edinburgh — Edradour Housing Association 3,168 0 36 — Arbroath — Erskine Hospital Housing Society 13,406 0 49 — Renfrewshire — Fifty Housing Association 15,506 0 50 — Edinburgh — Haig Memorial Homes 16,656 0 56 — Edinburgh and Glasgow. — Hydro-Electric Housing Society 22,341 0 86 7 Various sites — Inverlochy Village Society 40,937 10 100 — Inverness-shire — Kinlochleven Village Improvement Society 25,678 0 80 — Argyllshire See note 2 Lucy Sanderson Cottage Homes 4,032 0 16 — Galashiels — National Trust for Scotland Housing Society 656 0 3 — Perthshire — Prior Park Housing Society 9,256 10 34 — Edinburgh — South of Scotland Electricity Housing Society 7,500 0 96 — File — Scottish Veterans Garden City Society 268,007 0 431 — Various sites — Scottish War Blinded Housing Society 4,698 0 17 — Midlothian — Thistle Foundation 30,820 0 97 — Edinburgh — Viewpoint Housing Society 16,593 0 140 32 Edinburgh — Walter Nichol Scott Housing Association 1,073 0 6 — Hawick — Waverley Self-Build Housing Association 13,647 0 48 — Edinburgh — West Lothian Housing Society 44,017 0 — — West Lothian See note 2 Notes 1. The table includes public utility societies (the forerunners of "housing associations") under early enactments, where the bodies concerned are still receiving subsidy under any Act. 2. Subsidy to a public utility society under the 1919 Act was calculated as a percentage of the loan charges on the capital cost of the scheme and was not a subsidy in respect of each house. Number of houses provided in these cases are not now readily available.