HC Deb 01 February 1961 vol 633 cc133-4W
95. Mr. Nabarro

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many owner-occupiers of new dwelling-houses came into assessment for Income Tax Schedule A for the first time in 1960; what is the cumulative number of Schedule A assessments for owner-occupiers at 1st January, 1961; and what Schedule A revenue in total, respectively before and after accounting maintenance relief Schedule A, he now anticipates in the year 1960–61 ending 5th April next as a result of last year's houses newly owner-occupied.

Sir E. Boyle:

No estimate has been made of the number of new owner-occupied houses assessed during 1960. For the total number of owner-occupied houses I would refer the hon. Gentleman to the estimate I gave him on 30th January (HANSARD, 30th January, Written Answers, col. 87). There is not enough evidence on which to estimate the revenue from new houses in 1960–61.

96. Mr. Nabarro

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he is aware that the cost of replacing a solid fuel fire grate or stove is admitted by inspectors of taxes within a maintenance relief claim in respect of Income Tax Schedule A, whereas the cost of replacement of an electric fire or a water heater is not so admitted; what is the reason for the exclusion of electrical appliances from relief; and what steps he proposes to take to put all domestic heating fixtures on a similar basis in this context.

Sir E. Boyle:

I assume that my hon. Friend is referring to claims made by owner-occupiers. To be admissible in a maintenance claim the expenditure must be incurred by the claimant in his capacity as owner of the property. The repair or replacement of a movable electric fire or a movable water heater is an occupier's expense and not admissible; on the other hand, the cost of repairing or replacing an electric fire permanently built into the wall or an immersion heater inserted into a fixed hot-water tank is admissible.

Forward to