HC Deb 30 July 1951 vol 491 cc119-20W
Mr. Thornton-Kemsley

asked the Minister of Food if he will publish a table showing the current average weekly tonnage of sugar distributed to trade users, trade by trade, and for the basic domestic ration; and comparable figures for a year ago.

Mr. Webb

The current figures, and comparable ones for 1950, are as follow:

Sugar, as refined, for the production of Weekly Average
1951 1950
Tons Tons
Preserved, mincemeat and fruit curd 3,961 3,793
Chocolate and Sugar Confectionery 3,529(a) 3,477
Cake and Flour Confectionery 2,286 2,211
Syrup and Treacle 1,539 1,539
Biscuits 1,011 915
Beer 883 883
Soft drinks (liquid) 581 592
Condensed Milk 413 625
Canned fruit and vegetables 347 318
Bakers' prepared materials 257 268
Medicinal preparations 227 227
Table jellies 225 206
Ice cream 199 199
Coffee essence 157 128
Candied peels and cherries 102 101
Cider 87 68
Breakfast cereals 76 72
Pickles and Sauces 67 60
Lemonade powder 65 53
British Wines 61 57
Cake and flour mixtures 59 55
Medicated Sugar Confectionery 39 37
Miscellaneous 667 462
TOTAL TRADE USERS 16,838 16,346
BASIC DOMESTIC RATION (excluding bonuses and catering) 14,596 11,440
(a) In addition a small quantity of sugar may be given in lieu of sweetened condensed milk.

Mrs. Ganley

asked the Minister of Food whether having regard to the change in circumstances since the devaluation of sterling, he intends to continue the special rebates paid by his Department to exporters on the sugar, molasses and glucose content of their exported products.

Mr. Webb

After consulting my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, I have decided to discontinue the payment of those special rebates on goods exported as from 1st December next.

When the sugar duties were reduced by 1¼d. a lb. in April, 1949, with appropriate reductions on molasses and glucose, there was no corresponding reduction in the issue prices of these commodities in the United Kingdom, but special rebates were introduced to ensure that exporters did not suffer from the reduced rate of Customs drawback. British manufacturers were thus able to compete in overseas markets on the same terms as before the reduction in the duties and my Department was able to pay the rebates without loss on the raw materials.

As a result, however, of the revaluation of sterling in September, 1949, and the subsequent increases in world prices, the conditions under which exporters of these products have to compete in overseas markets have been substantially improved, and the continuation of the special rebates is, therefore, considered to be no longer justified. There would, moreover, now be a loss to the Exchequer if the rebates were continued. Their withdrawal should not materially affect our exporters' power to compete effectively with manufacturers abroad.

Forward to