§ Mr. Turtonasked the Minister of Transport whether he has yet received the report of his inspector on the inquiry into his proposal to by-pass Borough-bridge and Kirby Hill?."
§ Mr. BurginYes, Sir; I propose in due course to make the order in the terms of the draft served upon the County Councils of the North and West Ridings, subject to a possible slight modification as regards the point at which the road crosses the Ure.
§ Mr. Turtonasked the Minister of Transport whether the evidence of the witnesses called by the objectors at the inquiry into the proposed Boroughbridge and Kirby Hill by-pass was permitted to be tested by examination and cross-examination, 415W and in what respect the procedure with regard to the calling and the giving of evidence by witnesses at this inquiry differed from the practice laid down in the High Court of Justice?
§ Mr. BurginOne of my technical officers was present at the inquiry to explain the details and implications of my proposal. No formal cross-examination took place but I understand that he both asked and answered questions. My hon. and learned Friend will no doubt recognise that an inquiry of this nature is not analogous to an action in the High Court. I am empowered to hold the inquiry only when I am satisfied that it is expedient to construct a by-pass to a Trunk Road; accordingly, the purpose of the inquiry is to acquaint myself, before I am committed to the proposal, with the views of those who may be affected by it.