HC Deb 24 May 1927 vol 206 cc1858-60W
Mr. MOSLEY

asked the Secretary of State for War whether the rules governing the employment of military bands in private engagements, instituted by the Labour Government, are still in force?

Captain KING

I assume the hon. Member refers to the arrangement under which, before a military band accepted a civil engagement, the General Secretary of the Musicians' Union was asked in each case to advise what would be the charge made at the current Musicians' Union rate. After a full trial, this arrangement was found to be impracticable and was cancelled, but Commanding Officers are required, before accepting band engagement, to satisfy themselves, after reasonable inquiry, that the terms offered are not less than those charged by local civilian bands.

Mr. MOSLEY

asked the Secretary of State for War whether he will cause a Paper to be issued showing the engagements undertaken by the eight staff bands in London during the past 12 months; the number of performers employed for each engagement; the fee received for each engagement; and the amount received by the men and the amount received by the bandmaster?

Captain KING

In view of the labour which would be involved in preparing such a return, I do not think that I should be justified in calling for this information.

Mr. MOSLEY

asked the Secretary of State for War whether, seeing that a large number of civilian musicians are totally unemployed, largely as a result of permitting the regimental bands of His Majesty's forces to accept private engagements, he will issue instructions to curtail the number of private engagements that a military band may accept in any one year?

Captain KING

I have no knowledge of the conditions referred to at the beginning of the question. Military bands are only permitted to accept civil engagements because there is a public demand for their services, and they are not permitted to do so on terms which are lower than those which would be offered in the same circumstances to a civilian band. I am not prepared, therefore, to issue instructions on the lines suggested.

Mr. MOSLEY

asked the Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that, while the total fee paid to military bands for an engagement may be in accordance with trade union rates, the members of the band individually receive less than the trade union rate, and a very large proportion of the fee is retained by the bandmaster; and whether he proposes to take any action to ensure that each bandsman receives payment at the trade union rates?

Captain KING

The allocation of the fees received by military bands for civilian engagements rests, according to custom, with the Commanding Officer. I

Rural District In respect of maintenance expenditure. In respect improvement works and other purposes. Total
On roads and bridges in Classes I and II. On certain unclassified roads.
£ £ £ £
Ash by-de-la Zouch 429 753 85 1,267
Barrow-upon-Soar 1,644 4,638 2,062 8,344
Belvoir 618 117 735
Billesdon 150 1,170 428 1,748
Blaby 134 650 1,783 2,567
Castle Donington 1,038 1,065 2,103
Hallaton 363 363
Hinckley 108 1,013 1,728 2,849
Loughborough 94 574 284 952
Lutterworth 411 1,806 1,081 3,298
Market Bosworth 191 1,613 1,413 3,217
Market Harborough 85 1,232 4,327 5,644
Melton Mowbray 173 3,479 3,814 7,466
Total 3,419 18,947 18,187 40,553

do not propose to alter the existing practice.

Forward to