HC Deb 06 December 1922 vol 159 cc1817-8W
Mr. HANCOCK

asked the Secretary for Mines whether it is in order for a man to act as medical referee who has previously acted in the same case and in a private capacity for employer or employé if he so acts, is his decision as medical referee final and binding and the applicant debarred from going to any other tribunal; and will he appoint additional medical referees so that employers and employés may have a choice and better opportunities for going to a medical referee whose decision cannot be affected by any previous examination in that particular case?

Mr. BRIDGEMAN

My hon. Friend has asked me to reply to this question. A medical referee under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1906, is forbidden by the Act from acting as referee in a case where he has already been employed in his private capacity. If in any case a referee acted contrary to this prohibition, his decision, I am advised, would not be binding. I have no reason to think that the existing appointments are insufficient, but I am always prepared to consider carefully any representations as to the need of supplementing the arrangements for any particular district.

Mr. W. THORNE

asked the' Home Secretary whether it is the intention of the Government to keep the present Workmen's Compensation Act in operation until the Government is prepared to introduce a new Bill?

Mr. BRIDGEMAN

As stated in my replies to the questions asked on this subject on Monday last and on the 28th November, I am not in a position at present to make any announcement in this matter, but the Workmen's Compensation (War Addition) Acts are continued by the Expiring Laws Act until the end of 1923.

Forward to