HC Deb 29 July 1910 vol 19 c2632W
Mr. MacNEILL

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether in 1880 it was ascertained that there was a deficiency in the assets of the Trustee Savings Banks, such deficiency being estimated by Mr. Gladstone as £3,565,000; whether, for the purpose of making good that deficiency, there was set up an annuity of £86,672; by what method of valuation it was ascertained that there existed a deficiency which it was deemed necessary to make good by a charge upon the taxpayers; if he will state whether the application of the same method to the assets of the Post Office Savings Bank and the Trustee Savings Banks would reveal deficiencies; and, if so, what would be the amount of these deficiencies in the assets of the Post Office Savings Bank and the Trustee Savings Banks respectively?

Mr. LLOYD GEORGE

The capital deficiency on the Trustee Savings Banks Fund at 20th November, 1880, was estimated at £3,565,000 as stated, and an annuity of £83,672 was set up to replace the same. In arriving at the deficiency the securities held were valued on a 3¼ per cent. basis, in the manner laid down in Section 1 of the Savings Banks Act, 1880, 43–44 Vic., cap. 36. This method of valuation was changed to a 2¾ per cent. basis in 1891 and finally abandoned altogether in 1904 as regards trustee banks, and it has never been applied as regards the Post Office Savings Bank. I do not think its revival would serve any useful purpose.