HC Deb 18 April 1910 vol 16 cc1853-4W
Mr. GIBSON BOWLES

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer can he state for each of the years 1881–2 to 1893–4, both inclusive, the total aggregate amount of incomes subject to Income Tax on which tax was received; abatements allowed; life insurance premiums allowed; income, including abatements and life insurance premiums; increase per cent, over the preceding year; net produce of Income Tax, and average virtual rate of tax per cent.?

Year. Total aggregate amount of incomes subject to Income Tax on which Tax was received. Abatements allowed. Life Insurance Premiums allowed. Income including Abatements and Life Insurance Premiums. Increase or decrease per cent, over the preceding year. Net Produce of Income Tax. Average virtual rate of tax per cent.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
£ £ £ £ £
1881–82 457,000,000 46,300,000 2,540,000 505,840,000 — 9,578,414 1.89
1882–83 468,000,000 47,900,000 2,650,000 518,550,000 2.51 12,751,661 2.46
1883–84 481,000,000 49,500,000 2,870,000 533,370,000 2.85 10,083,927 1.89
1884–85 478,000,000 51,500,000 3,000,000 532,500,000 .16 12,013,332 2.25
1885–86 473,000,000 52,600,000 3,170,000 528,770,000 .70 15,843,065 2.99
1886–87 469,000,000 54,370,000 3,450,000 526,820,000 .37 15,723,555 2.98
1887–88 476,000,000 54,750,000 3,520,000 534,270,000 1.41 13,948,844 2.61
1888–89 489,000,000 55,090,000 3,640,000 547,730,000 2.52 12,273,521 2.24
1889–90 512,000,000 55,920,000 3,890,000 571,810,000 4.40 12,849,349 2.24
1890–91 530,000,000 57,280,000 3,900,000 591,180,000 3.39 13,295,136 2.24
1891–92 537,000,000 57,880,000 4,170,000 599,050,000 1.33 13,428,780 2.24
1892–93 537,000,000 59,160,000 4,360,000 600,520,000 .25 13,439,135 2.23
1893–94 525,000,000 61,130,000 4,730,000 590,860,000 1.51 15,337,000 2.59

As the official statistics based upon the statutory rules of assessment in force for the years in question are not in the form

year, the total number of estates, the total capital amount on which those duties were actually paid, and the average aggregate rate per cent, of the whole duties?

Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE

presented the following statement for each of the years 1881–2 to 1893–4, both inclusive, showing:—

Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE

submitted the following Return, showing for each of the years 1881–2 to 1893–4, both inclusive, the total aggregate amount of incomes subject to Income Tax on which tax was received, abatements allowed, life insurance premiums allowed, income including abatements and life insurance premiums, increase per cent, over the preceding year, net produce of Income Tax, and average virtual rate of tax per cent.

required by the Return, the figures in columns 2 to 6 and 8 are necessarily estimates.