HC Deb 02 December 2002 vol 395 cc626-7W
Mr. Jenkins

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the position of(a) Tamworth and (b) Sutton Coldfield constituencies is in the national table of deprivation. [84174]

Mrs. Roche

The table shows how all wards in the Tamworth and Sutton Coldfield constituencies are ranked according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation and the six other domains included in the Indices of Deprivation 2000 (ID 2000). Under the ID 2000, the most deprived ward is ranked 1, while the least deprived is ranked 8,414.

Constituency/ward LA name Rank of index of multiple deprivation Rank of income domain Rank of employment domain
Tamworth
Bourne Vale Lichfield 4,965 6,550 6,411
Fazeley Lichfield 2,786 2,786 3,104
Little Aston Lichfield 8,117 8,371 7,655
Mease Valley Lichfield 4,915 5,159 7,266
Shenstone Lichfield 6,203 5,532 6,603
Stonnall Lichfield 7,537 7,209 6,826
Tame Lichfield 7,341 8,084 6,806
Amington Tamworth 2,569 2,187 3,520
Belgrave Tamworth 2,028 1,707 3,080
Bolehall Tamworth 2,425 3,568 3,071
Castle Tamworth 3,635 3,729 3,573
Glascote Tamworth 1,003 593 1,697
Mercian Tamworth 3,883 3,959 3,848
Spital Tamworth 3,382 3,049 2,878
Stonydelph Tamworth 2,255 2,076 4,096
Trinity Tamworth 5,315 5,892 6,297
Wilnecote Tamworth 3,962 4,183 5,274
Sutton Coldfield
Sutton Four Oaks Birmingham 7,033 5,950 5,430
Sutton New Hall Birmingham 4,991 3,972 4,148
Sutton Vesey Birmingham 6,626 5,535 5,028

Constituency/ward LA name Rank of health domain Rank of education domain Rank of housing domain Rank of access domain
Sutton Coldfield
Sutton Four Oaks Birmingham 5,406 7,891 8,117 3,570
Sutton New Hall Birmingham 3,992 6,598 4,870 4,791
Sutton Vesey Birmingham 5,178 6,885 7,113 4,550

Forward to