HC Deb 28 June 2001 vol 370 cc134-9W
Jeremy Corbyn

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what studies his Department is undertaking as to the accountability of registered social landlords; and if he will make a statement. [1080]

Ms Keeble

None. Registered social landlords are regulated by the Housing Corporation, an Executive NDPB of my Department, through published performance standards covering, governance, finance, lettings, tenant involvement, development and management. Registered social landlords are expected to meet these standards. Where they do not, the Housing Corporation has regulatory powers to enforce compliance.

The Housing Corporation is currently implementing a programme of changes to revise its regulatory framework for registered social landlords. Through this programme, the Housing Corporation is reviewing performance standards, encouraging a best value approach by registered social landlords and introducing a new inspection service to examine the services landlords provide. The new framework will be in place by April 2002.

Registered social landlords are also accountable to their governing bodies, whose members act on a voluntary basis and who are drawn from a broad range of backgrounds. For example, the governing bodies of those registered social landlords which are set up as local housing companies (the most popular choice in recent years of registered social landlord for large scale voluntary transfers of properties from local councils)

Year Local authority housing

revenue account spending

on repairs

(£ million)

Local authority capital

expenditure on council

dwellings

(£ million)

Repairs expenditure

per dwelling

(£)

Capital expenditure

per dwelling

(£)

1996–97 2,262 1,581 657 459
1997–98 2,211 1,502 657 446
1998–99 2,201 1,594 677 490
1999–2000 2,126 1,484 686 479
2000–011 2,113 21,824 726 627
1 Provisional 2 Based on authorities planned expenditure for 2000–01, submitted to the Department in summer 2000

Jeremy Corbyn

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local government and the. Regions how many(a) dwellings were completed, (b) new council properties there were, (c) new housing association properties there were and (d) new co-operative properties there were in each London borough for each of the last five years. [1050]

Ms Keeble

The available figures are given in the table. The data collected by the Department do not distinguish completions for co-operative properties.

Housebuilding: Permanent dwellings completed by tenure
London borough/ Year Private enterprise Registered social landlords Local authority All dwellings
Barking and Dagenham
1996–97 1 1 1 1
1997–98 1 1 1 1
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–2000 1 1 1 1
2000–01 1 1 1 1
Barnet
1996–97 436 79 0 515
1997–98 459 178 0 637
1998–99 629 74 0 703
1999–2000 720 98 0 818
2000–01 488 168 0 656
Bexley
1996–97 387 63 0 450
1997–98 405 48 0 453
1998–99 189 19 0 208
1999–2000 179 27 0 206
2000–01 384 98 0 482

comprise at least a third of elected tenant representatives, with council nominees and independent members typically each having a third of places also.

Jeremy Corbyn

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what the expenditure from central Government sources was on(a) repairs to council properties and (b) capital improvements to council properties in each of the last five years and for the current year. [1048]

Ms Keeble

Information is not available in the form requested. The table shows actual expenditure, as reported to the Department, by local authorities in England on repairs and capital improvements to their housing stock in each of the last five years. Support for local authority housing from central Government has not generally been earmarked for particular purposes, so it is not possible to show separately the central Government contribution to this expenditure. Spending over this period has been affected by a fall in the number of local authority dwellings so the table also shows spending in per dwelling terms. Expenditure figures for 2001–02 are not available

Housebuilding: Permanent dwellings completed by tenure
London borough/ Year Private enterprise Registered social landlords Local authority All dwellings
Brent
1996–97 56 0 0 56
1997–98 29 1 0 30
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–2000 1 1 1 1
2000–01 1 1 1 1
Bromley
1996–97 307 137 0 444
1997–98 1 1 1 1
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–2000 1 1 1 1
2000–01 1 1 1 1
Camden
1996–97 238 279 0 517
1997–98 99 138 0 237
1998–99 366 85 0 451
1999–2000 157 166 0 323
2000–01 149 256 0 405
City of London
1996–97 0 0 0 0
1997–98 235 0 0 235
1998–99 163 0 0 163
1999–2000 280 21 0 301
2000–01 165 0 0 165
Croydon
1996–97 256 200 0 456
1997–98 213 362 0 575
1998–99 161 221 0 382
1999–2000 138 194 0 332
2000–01 165 77 0 242
Housebuilding: Permanent dwellings completed by tenure
London borough/ Year Private enterprise Registered social landlords Local authority All dwellings
Ealing
1996–97 263 0 0 263
1997–98 761 12 0 773
1998–99 331 125 0 456
1999–2000 148 125 0 273
2000–01 1 1 1 1
Enfield
1996–97 324 258 0 582
1997–98 549 51 0 600
1998–99 172 139 0 311
1999–2000 105 84 0 189
2000–01 576 344 0 920
Greenwich
1996–97 156 69 0 225
1997–98 205 226 0 431
1998–99 403 133 0 536
1999–2000 916 64 0 980
2000–01 439 147 0 586
Hackney
1996–97 64 406 22 492
1997–98 157 517 34 708
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–2000 349 91 0 440
2000–01 765 112 0 877
Hammersmith and Fulham
1996–97 29 14 0 43
1997–98 146 74 0 220
1998–99 122 22 0 144
1999–2000 83 23 0 106
2000–01 75 0 0 75
Haringey
1996–97 52 199 0 251
1997–98 68 131 0 199
1998–99 25 63 0 88
1999–20002 34 75 0 109
2000–01 126 59 0 185
Harrow
1996–97 49 83 0 132
1997–98 119 66 0 185
1998–99 146 5 0 151
1999–2000 94 3 0 97
2000–01 110 0 0 110
Havering
1996–97 234 65 0 299
1997–98 99 39 0 138
1998–99 225 25 0 250
1999–2000 237 47 0 284
2000–01 246 28 0 274
Hillingdon
1996–97 1 1 1 1
1997–98 97 293 2 392
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–20003 322 137 0 459
2000–013 270 286 0 556
Hounslow
1996–97 598 0 0 598
1997–98 373 38 0 411
1998–99 611 21 0 632
1999–2000 260 0 0 260
2000–01 240 24 0 264
Islington
1996–97 49 17 0 66
1997–98 151 0 0 151
1998–99 309 65 0 374
1999–2000 424 27 0 451
2000–013 213 44 0 257
Housebuilding: Permanent dwellings completed by tenure
London borough/ Year Private enterprise Registered social landlords Local authority All dwellings
Kensington and Chelsea
1996–97 206 255 0 461
1997–98 184 0 0 184
1998–99 155 41 0 196
1999–20003 208 20 0 228
2000–01 101 55 0 156
Kingston upon Thames
1996–97 169 87 0 256
1997–98 816 22 0 838
1998–99 444 2 0 446
1999–2000 331 45 0 376
2000–013 230 41 0 271
Lambeth
1996–97 1 1 1 1
1997–98 1 1 1 1
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–2000 1 1 1 1
2000–01 1 1 1 1
Lewisham
1996–97 1 1 1 1
1997–98 108 345 0 453
1998–99 193 167 0 360
1999–2000 156 95 0 251
2000–01 1 150 0 151
Merton
1996–97 204 133 0 337
1997–98 69 39 0 108
1998–99 108 129 0 237
1999–2000 204 149 0 353
2000–01 120 51 0 171
Newham
1996–97 105 296 0 401
1997–98 261 103 0 364
1998–99 132 180 0 312
1999–2000 398 120 0 518
2000–01 346 138 0 484
Redbridge
1996–97 458 50 0 508
1997–98 360 22 0 382
1998–99 95 5 0 100
1999–2000 462 39 0 501
2000–01 120 39 0 159
Richmond upon Thames
1996–97 48 23 0 71
1997–98 195 6 0 201
1998–99 617 8 0 625
1999–2000 145 30 0 175
2000–01 137 20 0 157
Southwark
1996–97 1 1 1 1
1997–98 1 1 1 1
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–2000 323 13 0 336
2000–012;0P 248 26 0 274
Sutton
1996–97 479 215 0 694
1997–98 306 32 0 338
1998–99 283 19 0 302
1999–2000 135 122 0 257
2000–01 280 161 0 441
Tower Hamlets
1996–97 1 1 1 1
1997–98 1 1 1 1
1998–99 1 1 1 1
1999–2000 1 1 1 1
2000–01 1 1 1 1
Housebuilding: Permanent dwellings completed by tenure
London borough/Year Private enterprise Registered social landlords Local authority All dwellings
Waltham Forest
1996–97 370 439 0 809
1997–98 103 743 0 846
1998–99 259 716 0 975
1999–2000 10 186 0 196
2000–01 216 257 260 733
Wandsworth
1996–97 320 1 0 321
1997–98 231 33 0 264
1998–99 515 36 0 551
1999–2000 541 76 0 617
2000–01 209 3 0 212
Westminster
1996–97 513 394 0 907
1997–98 560 111 0 671
1998–99 631 113 0 744
1999–2000 600 207 0 807
2000–013 957 358 0 1,315
1 Data not available because the local authority has reported for nine months or less in the year
2 Local authority has reported for only 10 months in the year
3 Local authority has reported for only 11 months in the year