§ Lord Geddesasked the Chairman of Committees:
What was the average age on 1 February 1999 of:
what would have been the average age of Members of the House had the House of Lords Reform Bill, as now drafted, been in force on 1 February 1999. [HL977]
- (a) those Members of the House who are Life Peers and active hereditary Peers;
- (b) Life Peers;
- (c) active hereditary Peers; and
§ The Chairman of Committees (Lord Boston of Faversham)If active hereditary Peers are defined as Hereditary Peers who attended at least one-third of the Sittings this Session, then the answers are as follows:
The average age of Members of the House on 1 February would have been 69 years and 0 months if the Reform Bill, as presently drafted, had been in force then.
- (a) the average age on 1 February of Life Peers and active hereditary Peers was 66 years and 10 months;
- (b) the average age on 1 February of Life Peers was 69 years and 0 months; and
- (c) the average age on 1 February of active hereditary Peers was 62 years and 0 months.
(Source: House of Lords Information Office.)