§ Mr. FitzpatrickTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence what key targets have been set for the Chief Executive of the Naval Recruiting and Training Agency for 1998–99. [46285]
167W
§ Dr. ReidThe Chief Executive of the Naval Recruiting and Training Agency has been set the following key targets for 1998–99:
- 1. To deliver personnel to the trained strength (or to other training organisations) within 10 per cent. variance from the tasked requirement.
- 2. To obtain a Customer Satisfaction Rating of at least 91 per cent.
- 3. To maintain success rates of 95 per cent. in Career Training and 97 per cent. in examined Pre-joining training.
- 4. To increase the strength of the RNR to at least 3,100 by 31 March 1999.
- 5. To retain tasked capacity while operating NRTA within its 1998–99 cash allocation of £233 million, a reduction of £7 million (3 per cent.) from 1997–98 figures.
- 6. To break even over the year in respect of the partnering arrangement with Flagship Training Ltd.
- 7. To review the NRTA's Corporate IS Strategy and produce a supporting Action Plan for its implementation, by 31 March 1999.
- 8. To include satisfactory accounts in the Agency Annual Report for Financial Year 1997–98, in preparation for passing a full external NAO Audit on the 1998–99 accounts included in the following year's Annual Report.
§ Mr. FitzpatrickTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence what key targets have been set for the Chief Executive of the RAF Personnel Management Agency for 1998–99. [46287]
§ Dr. ReidKey Targets have been set for the Chief Executive of the RAF Personnel Management Agency for the Financial Year as follows:
Key Target 1
- a. To ensure that the percentage of Peacetime Established Posts filled, as a ratio of the manning level, is 91.70% or greater.
- b. To man War, Tension, Crisis and MOD Authorised Unestablished tasks at 95% or greater.
Key Target 2
To ensure that 80% or more of personnel given a posting that qualifies for a domestic move receive the required notice.
Key Target 3
To increase the number of operationally employable reservists to 2,900 by 31 March 1999.
Key Target 4
To ensure that the percentage variation between the actual trained strength and the authorised trained strength, taken as an average over the Financial Year, is no greater than †/- 1%.
Key Target 5
To deliver the £353,500, or 3% savings that accrue from the efficiencies planned for the Financial Year 1998–99.
§ Mr. FitzpatrickTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence what key targets have been set for the Chief Executive of the Training Group Defence Agency for 1998–99. [46288]
§ Dr. ReidKey Targets have been set for the Chief Executive of the Training Group Defence Agency for the Financial Year 1998–99 as follows:
Key Target—Quality of Product
Achievement of customer satisfaction with the quality of graduate trainees as reflected in Customer Advisory Committee reports to the Air-Officer Commanding in Chief.
Target for 1998–99: Development of quality monitoring system by 31 March 1999.
168WKey Target 2—Efficiency
To deliver the savings that accrue from the efficiencies planned for FY98–99.
Target for 1998–99: £10.4M (3%)
Key Target 3a—Quantity of Output (Flying Training)
The percentage of trained aircrew delivered against RAF requirements.
Target for 1998–99: 96.0%.
Key Target 3b—Quantity of Output (Ground Training)
The percentage of trained personnel delivered against RAF requirements.
Target for 1998–99: 97.0%.
Key Target 4—Development of Output Costings and Unit Cost Measures
To provide full output costings and associated unit cost measures for the Agency by FY00–01.
Target for 1998–99: Output costing model.
§ Mr. FitzpatrickTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence what key targets have been set for the Chief Executive of the Army Base Repair Organisation for 1998–99. [46286]
§ Dr. ReidThe Chief Executive of the Army Base Repair Organisation has been set the following Key Targets:
- 1. To deliver a responsive service which matches the needs of the customer in peace and for operations to the agreed timeliness, quantity and quality criteria, to the maximum extent possible with available resources.
- 2. To remain within ABRO's allocated cash budget.
- 3. To reduce the ratio of labour costs to hours of production by 2 per cent. from those of the averaged last three years.
- 4. To delivery objective measures of customer satisfaction.
- 5. To deliver an implementation plan embracing the endorsed recommendations from the Agency and ES Next Steps Reviews.