§ Mr. MaplesTo ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to his answer of 12 January 1998,Official Report, columns 155–56, if he will publish the full text of (a) the guidance given to regional chairmen in June on NHS board appointments and (b) the guidance given by regional chairmen to council leaders in June when requesting nominations for NHS board appointments, together with accompanying documentation in each case. [27811]
§ Mr. DobsonCopies of the guidance have been placed in the Library.
Percentages Review Body 1993–94 1994–95 1995–96 1996–97 1997–98 1998–99 Apr. 1994 Jan. 1995 Apr. 1996 Dec. 1996 Apr. 1997 Dec. 1997 Apr. 1998 Dec. 1998 AFPRB 1.5 2.7 0.9 2.6 2.7–3.3 1.0 2.00 1.0–1.4 2.00 1.75–2.2 DDRB 1.5 3.0 — 2.5–3.0 2.8–5.8 1.0 2.00 1.4 2.00 4.2–5.2 NPRB 1.5 3.0 — 11.0 12.0 — 2.00 1.3 2.00 1.80 STRB 1.5 2.9 — 2.7 2.75 1.0 2.00 1.3 2.00 1.80 SSRB Senior Military 20 2.75 — 3.2 2.9–4.6 1.0 2.00 0.75–4.0 2.00 0.3–5.0 Judiciary 20 2.75 — 32.5 2.90 1.0 2.00 1.0–5.0 2.00 3.50 Senior Civil Service 20 2.75 — 2.5 4— — — — 4— — Average Recommendation — 3.1 52.7 54.0 3.3 3.9 Award (In-year) 1.5 3.1 52.7 53.3 2.4 2.7 1 Initial increases in central pay scales, supplemented by local pay negotiations. 2 The Pay Review Bodies were asked not to report in 1993. 3 To implement a recommendation in the 1994 SSRB report, the Judiciary receive an additional 0.63–2.48 per cent. annual increase for five years from 1 April 1995. 4 For the Senior Civil Service, new pay ranges were set in 1996–97 and increased by 2.75 per cent, in 1997–98 and 3.5 per cent in 1998–99. Within these ranges, individual performance-related increases were staged on the same basis as other groups. 5 Excluding Nurses whose pay was supplemented by local pay negotiations.