HC Deb 01 April 1998 vol 309 cc532-3W
Jane Griffiths

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will make a statement about the problems associated with the thaumasite form of sulphate attack on concrete. [37704]

Mr. Raynsford

During recent strengthening operations on two of the older overbridges on the M5 in Gloucestershire, an unexpected deterioration was noted in some of the concrete columns below ground level. Consultations with BRE identified this as the thaumasite form of sulphate attack. Foundations on a further three bridges were examined and were found to be exhibiting similar deterioration.

The Highways Agency's view is that this does not pose a threat to the structural stability of the bridges, nor is there any risk to the safety of road users. The Agency are drawing up a programme to identify which bridges might be subject to this form of problem and to investigate those bridges.

BRE has been conducting research into this form of sulphate reaction since 1990 for my Department. But until the cases on the M5 were discovered last week, only three such incidents of damage to concrete foundations had previously been identified in the UK. It appears that compliance with standard design guidance on protection against sulphate attack does not guarantee protection of concrete against the thaumasite form of reaction. At present, BRE are undertaking both laboratory and long-term field studies into this phenomenon. These studies have led them to the conclusion that this form of sulphate reaction can only occur when there is a combination of:

  1. (a) A source of sulphates, a commonly found in clay soils;
  2. (b) Very wet, cold conditions; and
  3. (c) A source of calcium carbonate in the concrete (limestone aggregate in the cases investigated).

The expert independent advice received from the BRE is that, while they believe that their initial findings indicate the need for wider study, they are strongly of the view that any damage to buildings would be gradual and there is no danger to people in buildings.

In the light of the problems discovered on the M5, I have today appointed Professor Leslie Clark to chair an expert group to study the phenomenon further and to report to me as soon as possible. The Group will develop guidance and advice on any implications for existing buildings and structures and on the design and specification of new construction.

Forward to