§ Lord Denningasked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether the first part of the Lord Advocate's Answer of 7th December (H.L. Deb, col. WA61), is simply a repetition of the statute itself and requires an affirmative answer; whether the second part is a simple matter of interpretation on which there is no 127WA case law: and whether they agree that, since they introduced the Bill, they should know the meaning intended.
§ The Lord ChancellorI do not have anything to add to the answers which have already been given on this matter.