HC Deb 03 July 1992 vol 210 cc736-9W
Mr. Madden

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many representations he has received from hon. Members during(a) the first quarter of 1991 and (b) the first quarter of 1992 to delay the removal of passengers refused entry at British ports of entry; and for both periods, how many representations resulted in (i) the delay of the passenger's removal for up to a week, (ii) the delay of the passenger's removal for more than a week and (iii) reversal of the immigration officer's decision.

Mr. Charles Wardle

The information requested is not available centrally.

Mr. Madden

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many wives and dependent children applying for entry clearance in the Indian sub-continent in each quarter since January 1991 were refused(a) on first application and (b) on second or subsequent application.

Mr. Charles Wardle

The information requested is given in the table. Separate information on first-time applicants and re-applicants is not available centrally.

Wives and children applying for entry clearance in the United Kingdom1
Post Newly received2 Granted3 Applications Refused initially4 Withdrawn or lapsed4 Awaiting first interview at end of quarter
Dhaka—1991
1st quarter 640 940 220 50 1,300
2nd quarter 920 730 120 80 1,400
3rd quarter 920 830 130 60 1,500
4th quarter 830 300 100 50 1,500
1992
1st quarter 680 610 180 30 1,300
Islamabad—1991
1st quarter 980 1,240 160 60 1,300
2nd quarter 810 870 70 40 940
3rd quarter 940 970 210 70 500
4th quarter 990 1,030 170 50 1,200
1992
1st quarter 1,020 1,060 130 70 660
1 Including all persons applying for a certificate of entitlement to the right of abode in the United Kingdom.
2 Data include some double counting in respect of applications recorded initially for entry clearance and then subsequently for a certificate of entitlement.
3 Granted initially or on appeal.
4 Since about the end of 1989, settlement applications have been refused in the circumstances where previously they would have been lapsed.

Note: Data on deferrals was discounted from May 1990.

Mr. Madden

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the average time taken by his Department to investigate cases referred from overseas posts in order to assess whether the maintenance and accommodation requirements of the immigration rules have been met.

Mr. Charles Wardle

The information requested is not available. Staff are, however, instructed to give priority to cases referred by overseas posts for decision or for enquiries to be made. If the hon. Member is concerned about the time taken to deal with any particular case, I should be happy to look into it.

Mr. Madden

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many applications from over-age

Wives and children refused1 entry clearance in the Indian sub-continent
Number of persons
Refused
Wives Children
1991
1st quarter 170 170
2nd quarter 110 90
3rd quarter 200 170
4th quarter 180 160
1992
1st quarter 220 160
1 These refusals are by an entry clearance officer. Some of these will be overturned on appeal.

Mr. Madden

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many applications for settlement by wives and children in(a) Dhaka and (b) Islamabad were (i) received, (ii) granted, (iii) refused, (iv) deferred at first interview, (v) lapsed and (vi) outstanding and awaiting first interview for each quarter since the beginning of 1991.

Mr. Charles Wardle

The information requested is given in the table. Data on deferrals was discontinued from May 1990.

reapplicants from the Indian sub-continent seeking to join a sponsor settled in the United Kingdom have been (a) made, (b) deferred, (c) refused and (d) granted in each year since 1986, to the first quarter of 1992; and how many such reapplicants in each category had undergone successful DNA tests.

Mr. Charles Wardle

The available information is that a total of 701 applications from over-age reapplicants in the Indian sub-continent to join parents in the United Kingdom have been decided under the terms of the concession announced by my right hon. Friend the then Home Secretary on 14 June 1989 at columns461–62. All of these cases involved over-age reapplicants who had established relationships by means of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence but did not quality for admission under the immigration rules. Entry clearance has been authorised in 126 of these cases and refused in 575.