§ Dr. GodmanTo ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many doctors are employed by his Department for the purpose of assessing attendance allowance and mobility allowance claims in(a) Inverclyde, (b) Strathclyde and (c) Scotland as a whole; on what basis they are employed; what salaries or fees they receive; and whether such payments are related to the number of claimants they examine.
§ Mr. ScottThe numbers of doctors who carry out examinations of claimants to attendance and mobility allowances in the areas mentioned are:(a) Inverclyde—30, (b) Strathclyde—428, (c) Scotland—982. The work is of a casual nature, the available cases being allocated among the doctors who are available and have been trained in the work. Payment is from a scale of fees agreed between the Treasury and the medical profession's representatives. A fee is paid for each case completed, individual case fees depending on the time taken to deal with that case.
§ Mr. JannerTo ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the average and what is the longest delay in hearing of appeals against refusals of mobility allowances, during each of the last five six-month periods for which records are available.
§ Mr. ScottAppeals against refusal of mobility allowance can be made to a social security appeal tribunal if the decision was not on medical grounds and to a medical appeal tribunal on medical questions. Information about these appeals is not available in the form requested. The national average clearance times, during the last 10 quarters, for appeals on mobility allowance to social security appeal tribunals, from date of lodgment to hearing, were as follows:
Quarter ending Weeks 30 June 1987 19.1 30 September 1987 20.6 31 December 1987 20.1 31 March 1988 23.3 30 June 1988 20.1 30 September 1988 20.5 31 December 1988 20.8 31 March 1989 21.8 30 June 1989 18.8 30 September 1989 17.6 The Department has recently began compiling information on the clearance times for appeals to medical appeal tribunals, but this has not been running long enough to provide representative figures. Information about the time taken to have a hearing on an appeal to a medical board is not kept.
Information about the longest delay in hearing any of these types of appeal can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.