§ Mr. CousinsTo ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the cost in revenue forgone of(a) mortgage interest relief, (b) superannuation contributions and (c)retirement annuity premiums, for each year since 1980; and if he will estimate for each year the number and percentage of owner occupiers who were in receipt of mortgage interest relief.
§ Mr. Norman LamontThe information is as follows. For 1983–84 onwards the figures for mortgage interest relief include the cost of relief given to non-taxpayers.
of tax units in each income band, and the percentage of tax units within each income band who receive the benefits of the relief; and if he will provide comparable figures for both income band and region of residence in 1985–86.
§ Mr. Norman LamontAvailable information is given in the table. Data for 1987–88 and provisional estimates are based on projections from the 1985–86 survey of personal incomes. Due to the small sample size it has been necessary to amalgamate certain income ranges.
315W
Range of total income Number of tax units1 with retirement annuity relief Average value of relief Total cost of relief Percentage of total cost Number of tax units1 paying tax Percentage of tax units Percentage of tax units receiving relief (thousands) (£) (£ million) (per cent.) (thousands) (per cent.) (per cent.) £20,000 to £30,000 160 370 60 13 1,800 9 9 Over £30,000 130 2,030 270 59 750 4 17 TOTAL 1,160 400 460 100 20,600 100 6 1 Single persons and married couples.
Analysis by region1 1985–86 Percentages Tax units2 with retirement annuity relief Tax units2 paying tax Northern 5 6 Yorkshire and Humberside 10 8 North West 11 11 East Midlands 7 7 West Midlands 8 9 East Anglia 5 3 South East 31 33 South West 11 8 England 88 85 Wales 4 4 Scotland 7 9 Northern Ireland 1 2 United Kingdom 100 100 1 Members of the Forces and Merchant Navy have not been allocated to regions or countries, but together with a small number of civil servants serving overseas, have been included in the figures for England. 2 Single persons and married couples.
Average gain/loss (—)3 per tax unit2 (£ per annum) Point of income distribution in 1988–891 1979–80 1980–81 1981–82 1982–83 1983–84 1984–85 1985–86 1986–87 1987–88 1988–89 Top 1 per cent. 11,230 10,730 9,260 9,420 10,240 12,820 13,000 13,120 13,350 22,680 Top 2 to 5 per cent. 1,760 1,520 810 890 1,290 1,660 1,790 1,980 2,360 3,350 Top 6 to 10 per cent. 800 660 240 300 540 720 810 990 1,330 1,770 Top 11 to 20 per cent. 490 390 170 200 330 440 510 640 910 1,220 Top 21 to 30 per cent. 360 270 90 110 220 310 380 480 680 910 Top 31 to 40 per cent. 290 210 60 70 160 240 300 380 540 740 Top 41 to 50 per cent. 250 180 30 50 130 200 260 320 460 630 Bottom 50 per cent. 120 70 -50 -40 30 80 120 150 210 290 All 410 330 140 160 270 370 430 500 630 910 1 Based on 20,900,000 single people and married couples expected to pay tax in 1988–89 and excluding 1,100,000 who would pay tax under the revalorised 1978–79 regime. 2 All information is in terms of tax units, i.e. married couples are counted as one and their incomes combined. 3 Average gains are calculated by reference to the estimated number who would be liable to pay tax under the indexed 1978–79 regime.