HC Deb 29 November 1983 vol 49 c459W
Mr. Michael Forsyth

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer which division of Her Majesty's Stationery Office is responsible for contract printing work for non-government bodies.

Mr. Hayhoe

Print procurement.

Mr. Michael Forsyth

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer why Her Majesty's Stationery Office tendered for the printing of the ASH Scottish Committee book "The Scottish Epidemic"; whether it was known at the time that the work would have to be subcontracted out; and what inquiries were made to ensure that the contract would not show a loss.

Mr. Hayhoe

The Scottish health education group invited Her Majesty's Stationery Office to tender for the printing of this book; it was known that the work would be subcontracted out. HMSO procedures ensure that it does not make a loss on this type of work, including this contract.

Mr. Michael Forsyth

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in calculating the comparisons with trade sources quoted in paragraph 3 of "Price Comparisons" on page 23 of Her Majesty's Stationery Office accounts 1981–82, what allowance was made for the discounts on published prices normally available to large-scale customers.

Mr. Hayhoe

None. All comparisons exclude discounts.

Mr. Michael Forsyth

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer on what basis Her Majesty's Stationery Office chose the public sector suppliers 1 and 2 and the private sector suppliers 1 and 2 quoted in paragraph 2 of "Price Comparisons" on page 23 of their 1981–1982 accounts.

Mr. Hayhoe

The criteria adopted were that:

  1. (a) both trade and public sector suppliers should provide items of a similar range and quality as HMSO;
  2. (b) trade suppliers should have a national organisation offering standard prices throughout the United Kingdom;
  3. (c) public sector suppliers should have a large enough centralised purchasing power to enable fair comparisons to be made.

Back to