§ Mr. Kilroy-Silkasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will set out the ages, prison in which held and length of time spent in custody of each of the 28 men aged 60 years and over given individual sentences of imprisonment in 1981 for vagrancy.
§ Mr. Mayhew[pursuant to his reply, 2 December 1982, c. 289]: The information requested is given in the following table:
429W
Receptions* into prison department establishments in England and Wales in 1981 of males aged 60 years and over under sentence of immediate imprisonment for vagrancy: by age on reception, establishment of initial reception and time served under sentence Age of reception Establishment of initial reception Days served under sentence 71 Pentonville 20 71 Pentonville 24 71 Pentonville 30 70 Pentonville 60 69 Pentonville 19 69 Oxford 9
Age of reception Establishment of initial reception Days served under sentence 68 Oxford 26 65 Winchester 59 65 Pentonville 19 65 Oxford 5 64 Oxford 37 64 Pentonville 18 63 Pentonville 20 63 Pentonville 19 63 Pentonville 5 63 Oxford 17 62 Bedford 4 62 Oxford 20 62 Oxford 31 62 Lincoln 10 61 Leeds 6 61 Pentonville 21 60 Pentonville 20 60 Pentonville 21 60 Pentonville 42 60 Pentonville 19 60 Pentonville 11 60 Winchester 18 * The figures are those recorded centrally and are approximate: detailed checking of individual class would involve disproportionate cost.
§ Mr. Kilroy-Silkasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how long each of the 24, 14 to 16-year-old boys spent in custody, who were found not guilty or not proceeded with in 1981 and yet who had been held on remand custody.
§ Mr. Mayhew[pursuant to his reply, 2 December 1982, c. 289]: Information is not available in the form requested. The available information is given in the following table:
Receptions* on remand into prison department establishments in England and Wales in 1981 of males aged 14 to 16 subsequently found not guilty or not proceeded with: by length of time between initial remand in custody and date of disposal at count† Length of time between initial remand in custody and date of disposal at count† Number of males Up to one month 7 Over one month up to two months 5 Over two months up to three months 3 Over three months up to four months 4 Over four months up to five months 2 Over five months up to six months 2 Over six months 1 Total 24 * The figures are those recorded centrally and are approximate; detailed checking of individual cases would involve disproportionate cost. † Including any time spent on bail after initial remand in custody.
§ Mr. Kilroy-Silkasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how long each of the 53, 14 to 16-year-olds girls given a non-custodial sentence in 1981 spent in custody after being held on remand in custody.
430W
§ Mr. Mayhew[pursuant to his reply, 2 December 1982, c. 289.]: Information is not available in the form requested. The available information is given in the following table:
Receptions* on remand into prison department establishments in England and Wales in 1981 of females aged 14 to 16 subsequently given a non-custodial sentence: by length of time between initial remand in custody and date of disposal at court† Length of time between initial remand in custody and date of disposal at court† Number of females Up to 1 month 33 Over 1 month up to 2 months 16 Over 2 months up to 3 months 2 Over 3 months up to 4 months 1 Over 4 months up to 5 months 1 Total 53 * The figures are those recorded centrally and are approximate; detailed checking of individual cases would involve disproportionate cost. † Including any time spent on bail after an initial remand in custody.