HC Deb 22 May 1979 vol 967 cc114-5W
Mr. Field

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list the number of claimants drawing (a) flat-rate national insurance and (b) earnings-related unemployment benefit for each year since 1948; and if he will list those totals as a percentage of the registered unemployed.

NUMBER OF CLAIMANTS RECEIVING (i) FLAT-RATE UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT WITH OR WITHOUT EARNINGS RELATED SUPPLEMENT* AND (ii) FLAT-RATE UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT WITH EARNINGS-RELATED SUPPLEMENT (ERS)†—GREAT BRITAIN
Estimated numbers of claimants in thousands Estimated numbers of claimants as a percentage of the registered unemployed
Year (November) Receiving flat-rate unemployment benefit with or without ERS Receiving flat-rate unemployment benefit with ERS Receiving flat-rate unemployment benefit with or without ERS Receiving flat-rate unemployment benefit with ERS
1948 255 78
1949 247 76
1950 212 70
1951 199 69
1952 292 72
1953 206 64
1954 150 57
1955 124 55
1956 155 58
1957 188 59
1958 334 63
1959 241 56
1960 178 51
1961 202 53
1962 314 58
1963 254 53
1964 172 49
1965 166 51
1966 275 58 57 12
1967 318 95 56 17
1968 294 97 53 18
1969 279 92 50 17
1970 302 104 51 17
1971 459 164 53 19
1972 352 124 45 16
1973 197 78 39 15
1974 275 106 44 17
1975 525 235 49 22
1976 (May) 587 245 49 20
1977 561 238 42 18
1978 (May) 526 204 41 16
* Taken from a 100 per cent. count on a day in November each year except 1976 and 1978 when the figures given refer to May (no count was made in November 1976 because of industrial action and the figures for 1978 are not yet available).
† Earnings-related supplement was introduced in October 1966. Estimates of ERS are derived from a 5 per cent. sample count made on the same day as the 100 per cent. count referred to above.

Mr. Field

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list the size of the increase in benefits necessary to compensate (a) single persons, (b) married couples and (c) claimants with one, two, three and four children, drawing each of the main social security benefits, for price rises resulting in financing each one penny reduction in the standard rate by increasing value added tax.

Mrs. Chalker

I regret that this information could not be provided without incurring disproportionate cost.