§ Sir J. Edenasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will now take steps to implement such recommendations of the Erroll and Clayson Committees with regard to licensing that he regards as non-controversial.
§ Mr. Roy JenkinsThe Erroll Committee made a number of useful recommendations for rationalising and simplifying licensing procedures which I should;
6W
PROJECTS APPROVED FOR MANCHESTER UNDER THE URBAN PROGRAMME Manchester County Borough (1969–74) Cost at time of approval£ Circular No. 1 (Approvals January 1969) Capital 1.Nursery class, Plymouth Grove … … 5,000 2.Nursery class, Claremont … … 5,000 3.Nursery class, St. Joseph's … … 9,385 4.Nursery class, Grimsworth … … 9,385 5. Nursery class, Our Lady … … 9,385 6. Nursery class, St. Mark's … … 9,385 7. Nursery class, St. Thomas' … … 3,500 8. Nursery class, St. Augustine's … … 500 9.Nursery class, St. Margaret's … … 8,700 10.Nursery class, St. Robert's … … 5,700 11. Nursery class, Stanley Grove … … 9,385 12. Nursery class, St. Francis … … 9,385 13. Nursery class, Heald Place … … 5,700 14. Day Nursery, Longhurst Road … … 51,500 15. Hostel for working girls … … 54,000 expect to be relatively non-controversial. but, as a matter of legislative priority, I cannot say when it will be possible to give effect to them. The recommendations of the Clayson Committee are a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland.