§ 104. Mr. Swinglerasked the Secretary of State for War why his regulations require an officer to attend the civil court when a soldier of his unit is charged with a civil offence in a case where he is unable to give positive testimony as to character because of the soldier's short period of service; and if he will abolish this practice.
§ Mr. HeadIn all cases, except those of a minor character, an officer attends the civil court, since he may be required to give not only such information on the soldier's general character as is available but also other information. This might include certain particulars of previous convictions, a statement, when possible, on the commanding officer's intention as regards the man's discharge, and details of the soldier's rate of pay. In certain cases, he might also pay a fine on behalf of the soldier.
Apart from these specific reasons, I think that the practice is generally desirable and I do not propose to abolish it.