§ Mr. Coldrickasked the Minister of Health the amounts advanced each year from 1940 to 1945 to individual county boroughs and boroughs, other than Metropolitan boroughs, in England and Wales, and burghs in Scotland, in order to pre-
Local Authority. 1940–41. 1941–42. 1942–43. 1943–44. 1944–45. County Boroughs £ £ £ £ £ Bootle … … … Nil 100,000 162,000 Nil -74,000 Brighton … … … Nil 70,000 62,000 Nil Nil Coventry … … … Nil 100,000 Nil Nil Nil Eastbourne … … Nil 167,700 51,300 132,900 63,500 East Ham … … 30,000 167,000 171,000 193,200 -110,000 Gt. Yarmouth … … 68,800 95,900 2,000 36,000 70,600 Hastings … … … Nil 58,500 70,000 54,800 88,000 Kingston-upon-Hull … Nil 289,000 58,000 -247,000 -100,000 Plymouth … … Nil 380,000 160,000 Nil 220,000 Portsmouth … … Nil 172,000 164,000 Nil 99,000 Southampton … … Nil 23,000 76,000 16,000 Nil Southend-on-Sea … 144,000 516,000 405,000 63,300 4,200 Swansea … … … Nil 230,000 -158,000 Nil 60,000 Wallasey … … … Nil 197,300 - 14,000 -50,000 Nil West Ham … … 350,000 886,000 492,000 Nil Nil Boroughs: Aldeburgh … … 1,400 200 Nil Nil Nil Bexhill … … … Nil 87,000 52,800 28,500 62,000 Bridlington … … 33,320 12,900 -11,020 -4,900 -1,500 Deal … … … 44,900 Nil 18,000 14,400 22,300 Dover … … … 21,900 78,700 32,600 17,000 38,400 Folkestone … … 67,600 24,800 3,000 49,400 35,500 Harwich … … … 6,700 11,000 Nil Nil Nil Hythe … … … 9,600 18,300 5,800 4,800 14,800 Margate. … … … 89,400 89,500 73,000 62,100 59,300 New Romney … … Nil 4,900 1,700 Nil Nil Ramsgate … … 56,000 109,000 44,100 43.500 80,800 Urban Districts: Broadstairs … … … 12,200 29,700 32,600 16,600 22,000 Canvey Island … … 12,700 500 -2,000 Nil Nil Clacton … … … 36,000 73,000 23,600 -23,600 Nil Cromer … … … 3,900 2,200 3,100 4,100 4,700 Felixstowe … … Nil 6,900 200 Nil -4,100 Frinton and Walton … 4,400 12,000 7,400 Nil 3,700 Herne Bay … … 14,000 13.700 -2,100 6,400 Nil Mablethorpe and Sutton Nil 9,600 -1,800 400 1,500 New Hunstanton … Nil 4,600 1,000 Nil 600 Sandown-Shanklin … Nil 10,100 4,400 15,680 15,300 Skegness … … … Nil 14,000 11,800 14,600 5,000 Ventnor … … … Nil Nil 2,400 2,000 -4,400 Whitley Bay … … Nil 4,000 Nil Nil -4,000 Whitstable … … Nil Nil 5,600 -2,200 1,200 Repayments are indicated by a negative sign. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland has informed me that during the local financial years 1941–42 and 1944–45 the sums of £80,000 and £8,000 respectively were advanced to the
352Wvent an increase in rates consequent upon enemy action; and the amounts repaid.
§ Mr. BevanAdvances to local authorities, other than Metropolitan Boroughs, in England and Wales to enable them to maintain essential services without an unreasonable increase in rates were as follows:
Burgh of Clydebank. The sum of £88,000 is in respect of deficits in the receipts from rates over a period of five years as follows:
353W
£ 1941–42 43,000 1942–43 10,000 1943–44 12,000 1944–45 19,000 1945–46 (estimated) 31,000 £115,000 It is probable that a further advance will be made before the 15th May, 1946, in respect of the current financial year. In addition to the advances to Clydebank, assistance has been given under the scheme to Dunbarton County and the Burghs of Fraserburgh and Portknockie in exceptional circumstances.
§ Mr. Coldrickasked the Minister of Health the names of the individual county boroughs and boroughs, other than Metropolitan boroughs, in England and Wales, and burghs in Scotland, where application for advances made to the Minister, in order to prevent an increase in rates consequent upon severe enemy action, had been rejected in cases where the loss of rateable value, due to destruction of property, exceeded 12 per cent. of the rateable value prevailing immediately prior to severe enemy action.
§ Mr. BevanFinancial assistance has been given to local authorities in cases where the loss of income, owing to the war, was so great that there was a serious risk of a breakdown of essential local services. The loss of income arose not only from destruction of property but also from other causes such as evacuation. All the circumstances of the local authority were taken into consideration and, in particular, the loss of productivity of a penny rate compared with that in 1939–40. I am not aware, nor is my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland aware, of any case in which an application for financial assistance has been refused where this loss of productivity exceeded 12 per cent.