HC Deb 26 November 1930 vol 245 cc1325-6W
Mr. GOULD

asked the Minister of Transport whether, in view of the deadlock between the local authority and the railway companies respecting the proposed alteration of the level crossing at Radstock, he will say what action he proposes to take respecting it?

Mr. HERBERT MORRISON

So far as I am aware, there is no deadlock between the railway company and the local authority. There has been some delay in the preparation of improvement plans, due. I am informed, to changes in the

— Scheme first brought to notice of Ministry by Surrey County Council. Preliminary approval Grant.
Dorking By-Pass: May, 1927 14.3.30 6.8.30.
Portsmouth Road widening:
(a) Esher—Cobham 12.11.29 14.5.30 (a) 10.9.30.
(b) A.245—Poiuters Road (b) 10.7.30.
Guildford-Godalming By-pass:
Scheme (1) 26.3.29. (1) 28.9.29 (1) 28.9.29.
Scheme(2) (2)30.7.30 (2)30.7.30.
Scheme(4) (4)30.7.30 (4)30.7.30.
New Road and Bridge, connecting Hampton Court Bridge with Esher Road:
(a) New Road 16.6.27 5.10.27 (a)28.5.29 (land), 21.8.29 (works).
(b) New Bridge over River Ember (b) 21.8.30.

urban district council's staff, but these plans will, I understand, be transmitted to the county council for their consideration during the present week.