§ Mr. W. THORNEasked the Minister of Labour, if he is aware of the decision given by Mr. Justice Roche, in the High Court in Scotland, that caretakers and charwomen employed in public offices, banks, and other places are not eligible for insurance under the unemployment scheme with the qualifications for caretakers and charwomen for this purpose; whether he is aware that he decided that they must be employed in any industrial concern or in a place attached to an industrial concern; that in consequence Mr. Gosling, the manager of the Dundee Labour Exchange, has received instructions not to pay unemployment insurance to women outside these categories; that many of these women have paid insurance contribution and have had their cards 82W stamped, but now find themselves disqualified; if he can state what is now the position of this class of work; whether they will have their money returned; and if he will take action in the matter?
§ Dr. MACNAMARADecisions, of which I am sending copies to my hon. Friend, were given by Mr. Justice Roche in the High Court in London on 13th January, the effect of which is that caretakers and charwomen employed in offices, banks and similar establishments are not insurable against unemployment. They are consequently not entitled to unemployment benefit in respect of such employment, but if they have paid more in contributions than they have received in benefit they may apply for a refund of the balance.