Mr. T. THOMSONasked the Minister of Health (1) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £838 as the purchase price of 1.030 acres compulsorily acquired at Kingsway by the Widnes borough for the purpose of a housing scheme; what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance;
(2) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £6,445 as the purchase price of 23.445 acres compulsorily acquired at Church Lane by the Wealdstone Urban District Council for the purpose of a housing scheme; and what was the rate-able value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance?
§ Major M. WOODasked the Minister of Health (1) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £11,030 as the purchase price of 45 acres compulsorily acquired at Oxford Road by the Reading county borough for the purpose of a housing scheme; what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the 627W amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance;
(2) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £1,903 as the purchase price of 5.472 acres compulsorily acquired at Bent Lane estate by the Prestwich Urban District Council for the purpose of a housing scheme; and what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance?
§ Mr. C. WHITEasked the Minister of Health whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £38,508 as the purchase price of 545.038 acres compulsorily acquired at Portsdown Hill by the Portsmouth county borough for the purpose of a housing scheme; and what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance?
§ Mr. GALBRAITHasked the Minister of Health (1) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £1,648 as the purchase price of 9.805 acres compulsorily acquired at the Terrace House estate by the Richmond (Yorks) borough for the purpose of a housing scheme; what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance;
(2) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £1,504 as the purchase price of 5.425 acres compulsorily acquired at Mill End by the Rickmansworth Urban District Council for the purpose of a housing scheme; what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance;
(3) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £870 as the purchase price of 5.402 acres compulsorily acquired at Horn-church by the Romford Rural District Council for the purpose of a housing scheme; and what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of 628W that subject has been reduced owing to severance?
§ Mr. HOGGEasked the Minister of Health (1) whether the arbritrator awarded the sum of £2,162 as the purchase price of 3.956 acres compulsorily acquired at George Street by the Uxbridge urban district council for the purpose of a housing scheme; what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance;
(2) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £4,195 as the purchase price of 9.312 acres compulsorily acquired at Udney Park estate by the Teddington urban district council for the purpose of a housing scheme; what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance;
(3) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £12,805 as the purchase price of 102.690 acres compulsorily acquired at Marley Pots farm by the Southwick-on-Wear urban district council for the purpose of a housing scheme; and what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance?
§ Mr. RAFFANasked the Minister of Health whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £522 as the purchase price of 2.668 acres compulsorily acquired at Shepperton by the Staines rural district council for the purpose of a housing scheme; and what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance?
§ Sir A. MONDThe facts as stated in the first part of each of the hon. Members' questions are correct. As regards the last part, I am obtaining the information asked for and will communicate with the hon. Members in due course.
Major BARNESasked the Minister of Health (1) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £15,618 as the pur- 629W chase price of 102 acres compulsorily acquired at Burgess Street (two cases) by the Southampton County Borough for the purpose of a housing scheme; what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance;
(2) whether the arbitrator awarded the sum of £7,450 as the purchase price of 34.021 acres compulsorily acquired at Western Road by the Southall-Norwood urban district council for the purpose of a housing scheme; and what was the rateable value of that land previous to acquisition or, if it formed part of a larger subject, the amount by which the rateable value of that subject has been reduced owing to severance?
§ Sir A. MONDThe facts as stated in the first part of each of the hon. Members' questions are correct. As regards the last part, I am obtaining the information asked for and will communicate with the hon. Member in due course.