LORDS AMENDMENT (Hansard, 19 November 2003)

HL Deb 19 November 2003 vol 654 cc2001-2 2001

§ 126 Leave out Clause 101

§ The Commons disagree to this amendment but propose the following amendment to the words so restored to the Bill—

§ 126A Page 65, line 47, at end insert—

"(2) In proceedings for an offence committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant when aged 21 or over, evidence of his conviction for an offence when under the age of 14 is admissible only if the court is satisfied that the interests of justice so require.
(3) Subsection (2) applies in addition to section 93."

§ Lord Bassam of Brighton
My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 126 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 126A to the words so restored to the Bill.

§ Moved, That the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 126 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 126A to the words so restored to the Bill.—(Lord Bassam of Brighton.)

2002

§ 126B Baroness Walmsley rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 126 and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 126A to the words so restored to the Bill, leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on its Amendment No. 126".

§ The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I spoke to this amendment with Amendment No. 114.I beg to move.

§ Moved, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 126 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 126A to the words so restored to the Bill, leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on its Amendment No. 126".— (Baroness Walmsley.)

§ On Question, amendment agreed to.

§ Motion, as amended, agreed to.