§ 2.45 p.m.
§ Lord Pearson of Rannoch asked Her Majesty's Government:
§ Whether they will invoke the principle of subsidiarity or otherwise secure the future of the London double-decker bus and of the British midi-bus in the current negotiations on European Community draft vehicle harmonisation directives.
§ The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport (Viscount Goschen)My Lords, these proposals are designed to form one of a number of directives designed to harmonise vehicle construction standards. We cannot accept this as an issue on which the doctrine of subsidiarity should apply. We shall, however, need to ensure that United Kingdom manufacturers will be able to accommodate the eventual standards, particularly in respect of double-decker buses and midi-buses.
§ Lord Pearson of RannochMy Lords, I thank my noble friend for that reply, which I fear will not bring much comfort to the British bus industry. Could I remind my noble friend that our bus industry is privatised and deregulated, unlike its European competitors, and it therefore needs to be able to respond to international and national market requirements without being fettered by red tape from Europe? In this context, is my noble friend aware that the British and Irish members of the Vehicle Working Group in Brussels are isolated from the other Community countries, so the proposed annex to the draft directives, which seeks to alleviate the position, does not in fact meet our requirements at all? Finally, could I ask my noble friend if he is aware not only that the annex would prevent our buses from circulating in Europe, but also that it would prevent them from being sold in the Far East, where at the moment they are doing extremely well in the interests of this country?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, I quite agree with my noble friends that there are clear benefits from being able to operate double-decker buses and midi-buses in this country. They are popular, and we feel that they should be able to continue. We aim to ensure that the eventual standards that do come forward will take that fully into account. Progress is being made on this issue, but indeed there is a long way to go in order to convince the Commission and other European countries of the value of our position.
§ Lord Stoddart of SwindonMy Lords, can the noble Viscount tell the House what on earth the sort of buses we run in London and elsewhere in this country has to 919 do with the interfering busybodies in Brussels? Is this not a case of Europe interfering in the nooks and crannies of our national life, which the Foreign Secretary said would not happen, particularly after the passing of the Maastricht Bill and the Maastricht Treaty? Will the Minister give the assurance that, if possible, any suggestion of doing away with our double-decker buses will be vetoed, or that at least the European Commission will be told that it will not be implemented?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, I do not agree with the noble Lord at all. We aim to establish a single market for vehicles. That will be to the benefit of manufacturers. It will be to the benefit of the United Kingdom bus and coach industry. I simply do not accept that this is a matter of subsidiarity.
§ Lord Stoddart of SwindonWhat is then?
§ Viscount GoschenHowever, we will put forward the case very strongly to ensure that our double-decker buses and midi-buses will be able to continue to be manufactured and sold.
§ The Earl of LauderdaleMy Lords, why can this not be treated as a matter of subsidiarity?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, the directive, when adopted, will be one of a number under Article 100a of the treaty designed to harmonise construction standards for motor vehicles. That will complete the single market for vehicles to the benefit of manufacturers. That is the reason why it is not an issue of subsidiarity.
§ Lord MonsonMy Lords, does the noble Viscount agree that Continental manufacturers wanting to sell into the British market are far more handicapped by having to convert from left-hand to right-hand drive than they are by having to adapt to the characteristics of the traditional British double-decker bus, and that therefore that particular argument is a totally spurious one?
§ Viscount GoschenNo, my Lords, absolutely not. But I agree that there is clearly a left-hand drive/right-hand drive problem. That is obvious. We wish to see proposals which are not design restrictive, which cope with the safety requirements but are not over-prescriptive in terms of comfort and design of the interior of the vehicles, for instance.
Lord Bruce of DoningtonMy Lords, is the noble Viscount aware that the only reason why this duff draft directive has come about is because the French and the Germans do not have the expertise to produce a double-decker bus? Will he accept that they have no capacity to deal with it at all and are well aware that they cannot compete with us in either South America or Asia? Does he agree that that is the reason why the whole issue has arisen?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, I agree with the noble Lord to the extent that the United Kingdom is the leader in the double-decker bus field.
§ Lord CockfieldMy Lords, does the Minister agree that a degree of harmonisation is absolutely essential, 920 otherwise the Germans or the Italians, for example, would be able to block the export of buses from this country? Does he further agree that the lack of harmonisation in the case of motor vehicles was one of the grounds on which the French, Italians and others tried to obstruct the export of Nissan motor cars manufactured in this country?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, my noble friend's question has given a clear explanation of the benefits of harmonisation in the industry.
§ Lord Carmichael of KelvingroveMy Lords, I should like to emphasise that I am not by any means anti-Europe. But will he accept that such regulations and directives test the patience of the British public? So far as I remember, the one that most nearly approached this case was the directive on Arbroath smokies. Can the Minister tell the House whether we have a bus industry which is capable of meeting all the requirements of the British bus fleet? Will these directives be an excuse to allow big imports from Europe of buses from Italy, Germany and perhaps France?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, I cannot answer the noble Lord on the matter of Arbroath smokies. But we do indeed have a very good bus industry in this country. It is well capable of producing buses to the highest specification. The important point is that we and the industry see the clear benefits of harmonisation. We are trying to achieve that without at the same time being over-prescriptive.
§ Lord TebbitMy Lords, will my noble friend not simply give the assurance which would satisfy everyone in the House that under no circumstances will Her Majesty's Government allow the Germans, Italians, French, Greeks or others to cook up a set of regulations which will prevent us from manufacturing, using and exporting double-decker buses? Will he accept that, if he were to say that, he would have the support of the whole House?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, I believe that I said very clearly that our aim in these negotiations is to produce proposals which our bus industry will be able to fit in with and that any moves which will require major design changes to our buses without taking into account safety considerations will be resisted.
§ Lord PestonMy Lords, will the noble Viscount accept that I find his answer very strange? Is he aware that, quite independently of whether one is for or against the Community, if ever there were a case in which a directive was not needed and competition was needed, this is it? All that is required is open competition, is it not? Why does he not agree, since I understand that that is part of the Government's policy anyway?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, open competition is a major plank of the Government's policy. Yet we still see the very clear benefits that will come from harmonisation of this industry within the European Community.
§ Lord TeviotMy Lords, I can speak for the industry and the industry is supportive of the Government in 921 what they are doing. Are not all these questions hares in relation to the issue of double-decker buses? Contrary to what my noble friend Lord Pearson said, the industry regards this hare about double-decker buses as being a Euro-myth?
§ Viscount GoschenMy Lords, I agree with my noble friend that we are keeping in very close contact with the bus industry on this point and will continue to do so.