HL Deb 27 June 1986 vol 477 cc573-8

2.4.P.m.

Report received.

Clause 1 [Appointment of authorised representatives of disabled persons ]:

Baroness Trumpington moved Amendment No. 1: Page 1, line 12, leave out ("provide—") and insert ("make provision with respect to the appointment of persons to act as the authorised representatives of disabled persons, including provisions—")

The noble Baroness said: My Lords, in moving this amendment, I speak at the same time to Amendment No. 2.

This Government amendment is designed to ensure that the position of disabled children in local authority care is adequately covered in the part of the Bill relating to the appointment of representatives. It has been tabled with the agreement of the noble Baroness, Lady Masham.

Subsection (3)(a) of Clause 1 envisages that in general the parents or guardians of disabled children should be able to appoint representatives for them. Parents could appoint themselves as representatives if they wished to do so. In some cases appointment of a representative by the parent would still be appropriate even if the child is in local authority care. But in other cases it would be wholly inappropriate, and indeed contrary to the child's best interests, to allow the parent of a child in care to appoint a representative, or for a representative appointed by the parent—who could be the parent himself—to have physical access to the child under the provision of Clause 2(5). Indeed, as I need hardly spell out to your Lordships, the reason for the child being taken into care in the first place will often be to protect him from his parents.

Nevertheless, it would in our view be wrong not to let a child in this position have a representative at all. The amendment would accordingly provide that, in circumstances which would be carefully set out in the regulations, it will be for the local authority to appoint a representative for a child in their care. We would propose to consult further on the exact circumstances in which these provisions would apply. The aim would be to cover all the situations where it would not be in the interests of the child to allow the natural parent to appoint a representative himself or herself. I beg to move.

Baroness Masham of Ilton

My Lords, I welcome the principle of this amendment; but I realise the complexities of how it might operate in practice. I am pleased that the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Trumpington, has said that some of the outstanding issues will be examined in detail by the Government in their proposals for the new child care legislation. The noble Baroness said that on the last stage of the Bill.

The officers of the department have been working very hard to make this amendment as helpful as possible for children. I thank them and also my two advisers, Peter Mitchell of RADAR and John Healey of MIND, for all the work done and the advice given.

Lord Ennals

My Lords, may I also say a word of thanks to the noble Baroness? Though she did not say so, I suspect that this amendment must have resulted from consultation that took place following four amendments at Committee stage—one of which I tabled and three of which I spoke to. I am extremely grateful to the noble Baroness for going into this question. I am glad also that she said that she would consult further about this matter as regards the regulations, and I hope that she will consult with organisations such as the Family Rights Group and others who have taken a special interest in this Bill in order that we can make quite certain that finally it is right. I am most grateful to her and I support the amendment.

Lord Swinfen

My Lords, I also welcome this amendment. I should like to ask my noble friend the Minister to bear in mind the need to ensure that the disabled person's representative is someone who can understand and communicate with a disabled person, who may find difficulty in communication. As I have said before, very often disabled people are able to communicate through only one or two people, and it is very important that that channel of communication be used.

With regard to children perhaps I may also say that as they grow older they often do not want their parents to be their representatives because, like able-bodied children, they are trying to leave the nest. It is sometimes difficult enough for able-bodied children to leave the family home and get away to become independent. It is even more difficult for a disabled person to do so, and sometimes parents and relatives can be a hindrance rather than a help.

Baroness Trumpington

My Lords, I thank both the noble Lord, Lord Ennals, and my noble friend, Lord Swinfen for their welcome to this amendment. I should like to assure them both that what they have said this afternoon will be very carefully noted and will form part of the consultation process.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Baroness Trumpington moved Amendment No. 2:

Page 2. line 7, leave out ("and") and insert— ("(aa) may provide for the appointment of a person as the authorised representative of a disabled person who is a child in the care of a local authority to be made by that authority in such circumstances as may be specified in the regulations;"').

The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Clause 2 [Authorised representatives of disabled persons]:

Baroness Trumpington moved Amendment No. 3: Page 4, line 4, after ("(3)") insert ("(aa) or").

The noble Baroness said: My Lords, this is a consequential drafting amendment following the earlier amendment to Clause 1. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Baroness Trumpington moved Amendment No. 4: Page 5, line 24, leave out ("and (8)").

The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I beg to move Amendment No. 4 and I shall speak to Amendment No. 5 at the same time. These are both drafting amendments. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Baroness Trumpington moved Amendment No. 5: Page 5, line 29, leave out ("in subsection (7)").

The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Clause 7 [Persons discharged from hospital]:

Baroness Trumpington moved Amendment No. 6: Page 11, line 32, leave out ("where that person will be") and insert ("in the case of a person").

The noble Baroness said: My Lords, this is a drafting amendment. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Clause 12 [Amendment of section 29(2) of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970]:

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 7: Page 16, line 16, leave out ("Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968") and insert ("1968 Act").

The noble Viscount said: My Lords, perhaps at the same time I may speak to Amendment No. 10. These are purely technical amendments reflecting the draftsman's preference for referring to an Act in its abbreviated form. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Clause 13 [Persons leaving special education: Scotland]:

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 8: Page 17, line 33, leave out ("an establishment of further education") and insert ("a further education establishment").

The noble Viscount said: My Lords, this is a purely technical drafting amendment. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 9: Page 18, line 22, leave out ("obtained") and insert ("attained").

The noble Viscount said: My Lords, this is another purely technical amendment, correcting a drafting error. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 10: Page 18, line 30, leave out ("Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968") and insert C1968 Act").

The noble Viscount said: My Lords, I have already spoken to this amendment with Amendment No. 7. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Clause 15 [Co-operation in planning]:

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 11:

Page 20. line 23, leave out from beginning to ("or") in line 25 and insert— ("15. In relation to disabled persons the duty under section 13 of the 1978 Act").

The noble Viscount said: My Lords, again, this is a purely technical amendment. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Clause 16 [Interpretation]:

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 12: Page 21, line 23, after ("1(6)) insert ("—(a) in relation to England and Wales,").

The noble Viscount said: My Lords, I should like to speak to Amendments Nos. 12 and 13 together. The term "guardian" is already defined in Clause 16 of the Bill. The main amendment provides a parallel definition in terms applicable to Scotland, and the other amendment is consequential. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 13: Page 21. line 25. at end insert ("and

(b) in relation to Scotland, means a person appointed by deed or will or by order of a court of competent jurisdiction to be the tutor, curator or guardian of a child; ").

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 14: Page 22, line 11, after (" "parent" ") insert ("—(a)").

The noble Viscount said: My Lords, 1 should like to speak to Amendment Nos. 14 and 15 together. The term "parent" is already defined in Clause 16 of the Bill. The main amendment provides a parallel definition in terms applicable to Scotland. I beg to move.

On Question, amendment agreed to.

Viscount Davidson moved Amendment No. 15: Page 22, line 13, at end insert ("and

(b) in relation to Scotland, means in the case of a child whose father is not married to the mother, his mother, to the exclusion of his father;").

On Question, amendment agreed to.

House adjourned at a quarter past two o'clock.