HL Deb 09 December 1981 vol 425 cc1342-4

2.58 p.m.

Lord Sandford

My Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question which stands in my name on the Order Paper.

The Question was as follows:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have yet analysed the results of the new consultation procedures established in the autumn of 1980 for the administration of farm capital grants in designated areas; and, if so, whether they will publish the results in the Official Report.

The Minister of State, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Earl Ferrers)

My Lords, our records show that in the period of 12 months since we introduced the notification procedures under the Ministry's capital grant schemes the national park authorities have received 2,462 notifications. All except eight of these have been satisfactorily resolved. During the same period 173 notifications were sent to the Nature Conservancy Council and all of these have been resolved. As requested, I am arranging for the figures to be published in full in the Official Report.

Following are the figures referred to:

FARM CAPITAL GRANT SCHEMES
NOTIFICATIONS BY FARMERS IN NATIONAL PARKS AND SITES OF

SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST

NATIONAL PARKS

Approved by NPA
National Park Authority Notifications as Received as Modified Formal Consultation with ADAS Outstanding
Lake District 321 314 6 1
Northumberland 121 92 27 2 1
North Yorks Moors 114 105 7 2 1
Yorkshire Dales 162 110 50 2 2
Peak Park 342 239 101 2
Exmoor 432 394 33 5 2
Dartmoor 120 110 8 2
Snowdonia 435 375 60
Brecon Beacons 342 310 26 6 2
Pembroke Coast 73 65 5 3
TOTALS 2,462 2,114(86%) 323(13%) 25(1%) 8(0.3%)
SITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST
Approved by NCC
Notifications as Received as Modified Withdrawn Outstanding
Nature Conservancy Council *173 142(82%) 26(15%) 5(3%) Nil
*ADAS was consulted informally on about half of the notifications.

Lord Sandford

My Lords, I am most grateful to my noble friend for that Answer and for that undertaking to publish the results in full in the Official Report. Would he not agree that this augurs well for the operation of Part II of the Wildlife and Countryside Act? Can he say now, haying analysed the facts and figures, whether he will undertake any review of this system? Moreover, in the light of that review and the coming into operation of the Wildlife and Country-side Act, can my noble friend say at what stage he thinks he will bring before the House details of the revised system of administration?

Earl Ferrers

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for his observations. I agree with him that it does augur well for Part II of the Wildlife and Country-side Act. I would only re-emphasise that, as regards matters of conservation, it is a question of understanding and co-operation between all those who are involved, and if the last 12 months' work has been indicative of that, then I think that we can look forward to success in the future. Of course, we shall keep the system under review, but I cannot tell my noble friend yet at what juncture the Government will state the results of any such review.

Lord Stanley of Alderley

My Lords, would my noble friend agree that the figures do show that farmers can co-operate successfully with the national park authority, particularly when helped by the Ministry of Agriculture officials in ADAS? Secondly, due to the Wildlife and Countryside Act, at present, if one farms in a national park and on a site of special scientific interest, One has to apply to both the national park authority and the Nature. Conservancy Council to clear the operation. Would it be possible in future for that to be altered so as to apply to only one, preferably the national park authority?

Earl Ferrers

My Lords, I agree with my noble friend that it does demonstrate the co-operation which is shown by the farmers and by ADAS and also by the national parks authorities and the Nature Conservancy Council. I think that it is a cause of rejoicing that that has been achieved.

My noble friend asked about those who farm in the area of a national park authority. Of course the Wildlife and Countryside. Act requires a farmer undertaking work on a site of special scientific interest to notify the Nature Conservancy. Council. The Ministry of Agriculture requires the national park authority to be notified as a condition of the grant scheme. We would endorse any arrangements which might be made for the Nature Conservancy Council to pass on to the national park authority information about work to be done, provided that the Ministry of Agriculture is satisfied that the national park authority knows of the work to be done in advance of it being done.

Forward to