HL Deb 30 October 1975 vol 365 cc668-9

[Nos. 72–80]

Clause 25, page 24, line 42, at end insert ("within such reasonable time as may be so specified").

The Commons agreed to this Amendment but proposed the following Amendment thereto:

Leave out ("so specified") and insert ("specified in the notice under subsection (10) above").

Clause 25, page 25, line 1, leave out subsections (12) to (16).

The Commons disagreed to this Amendment and proposed the following Amendments to the words so restored to the Bill:

Page 25, line 11, at end insert ("within such reasonable time as may be specifield in the order").

Page 25, line 11, at end insert— ("(12A) An order under subsection (12)above shall be laid before Parliament after being made").

Page 25, line 13, leave out ("until") and insert ("if before").

Page 25, line 14, at end insert ("either House resolves that an Address be presented to Her Majesty praying that it be annulled.

(13A) If no such resolution is passed by either House, the order shall come into effect at the end of the said period.

(13B) If such a resolution is passed by either House, Her Majesty may by Order in Council revoke the order.").

Page 25, line 15, leave out subsection (14).

Page 25, line 20, leave out ("either House is") and insert ("both Houses are").

Lord BESWICK

My Lords, I beg to move that this House doth agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 73 to the Lords Amendment No. 72 and that this House doth not insist on their Amendment No. 74, to which the Commons have disagreed, and agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 75 to 80 to the words so restored to the Bill. On this group of Amendments, which are essentially drafting and tidying up, I hope there will be more agreement. Amendment No. 73 to our Amendment No. 72 clarifies where the time within which information is to be provided will be specified. This drafting change is consequential on other of our Amendments to which the Commons agreed. The Commons disagreement with our Amendment No. 74 is a necessary consequence of their wish to preserve the advisory nature of the independent committee which we have just discussed. Commons Amendments Nos. 75 to 80 do not raise any new point of substance, but simply bring the wording of the words restored to the Bill more closely into line with those of other legislation which establishes similar procedures.

Moved, that this House doth agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 73 to the Lords Amendment No. 72 and that this House doth not insist on their Amendment No. 74, to which the Commons have disagreed, and agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 75 to 80 to the words so restored to theBill.—(Lord Beswick.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.