§ [Nos. 29 to 32]
§ Schedule 4, page 58, line 2, leave out ("the development plan in sub-paragraph (3)(c) and insert ("a local plan in sub-paragraph (3)(b).")
§ The Commons disagreed to this Amendment but proposed the following Amendments to the Bill in lieu thereof:
§ Schedule 4, page 58, line 2, leave out ("to the development plan in sub-paragraph (3)(c)") and insert ("in sub-paragraph (3)(b) to a local plan adopted or approved under Part II of the Act of 1971")
§ Schedule 4, page 58, line 32, leave out ("reference to") and insert ("references to Part II and")
§ Schedule 4, page 58, line 33, leave out ("a reference to") and insert ("references to Part II and").
§ Lord MELCHETTMy Lords, I beg to move that this House doth not insist on their Amendment No. 29, to which the Commons have disagreed, and agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 30 to 32 en bloc in lieu thereof. I hesitate to say again that these are drafting matter but I am advised that, as 1950 with Amendments Nos. 23 and 24, this is merely a redrafting of an Amendment passed by your Lordships. There is no doubt in my mind about this, just as there was no doubt in my mind about Amendments No. 23 and 24. I beg to move.
§ Moved, That this House doth not insist on their Amendment No. 29, to which the Commons have disagreed, and agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 30 to 32 en bloc in lieu thereof.—(Lord Melchett.)